Cited by 8

Tier 2 Supports to Improve Motivation and Performance of Elementary Students with Behavioral Challenges and Poor Work Completion

Oakes, Wendy Peia, Lane, Kathleen Lynne, Cox, Meredith, Magrane, Ashley, Jenkins, Abbie, Hankins, Katy·2012·Education and Treatment of Children

Abstract

We offer a methodological illustration for researchers and practitioners of how to conduct a development study consistent with the parameters delineated by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES; U.S. Department of Education [USDE], 2010) to explore the utility of an existing Tier 1 intervention applied as a Tier 2 support within a three-tiered model. Although the present study was not submitted to or funded by IES, it was developed as a pilot study to address two objectives. First, we explored the utility of a character development intervention focused on improving goal setting, decision making, and self-management skills to meet the behavioral and instructional needs of fourth-grade students who have behavioral challenges and limited work completion, but who have adequate literacy skills. The main questions pertained to treatment integrity and social validity, with a goal of having a fully-developed intervention ready for testing as part of an efficacy trial. Specific research questions were as follows: To what extent was this type of Tier 2 support implemented within the regular school day with integrity? What did teachers and students think about the goals, procedures, and outcomes? Did this initial evidence suggest this intervention resulted in students learning the content taught (proximal outcomes) translating into improved skill sets (intermediate outcomes) and ultimately improved motivation (distal outcomes)? Second, we conducted this study to field test the requir…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/etc.2012.0024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spectrum of related hardships in schools includes disruptive behaviors that detract from instructional time, have the capacity to diminish academic outcomes, and tarnish student-teacher relationships.

    “While Gottfredson and Hirschi place emphasis on potential criminal outcomes due to lack of self-control, the spectrum of related hardships in schools includes disruptive behaviors that detract from instructional time, have the capacity to diminish academic outcomes, and tarnish student-teacher relationships (Lane, Givner, & Pierson, 2004;Oakes et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oakes, W. P., Lane, K. L., Cox, M., Magrane, A., Jenkins, A., & Hankins, K.
Venue
Education and Treatment of Children
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2012
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
547-584
ISSN
1934-8924
Cited by
8
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review