The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Racialized Geography, Corporate Activity, and Health Disparities: Tobacco Industry Targeting of Inner Cities
Abstract
Industry has played a complex role in the rise of tobacco-related diseases in the United States. The tobacco industry's activities, including targeted marketing, are arguably among the most powerful corporate influences on health and health policy. We analyzed over 400 internal tobacco industry documents to explore how, during the past several decades, the industry targeted inner cities populated predominantly by low-income African American residents with highly concentrated menthol cigarette marketing. We study how major tobacco companies competed against one another in menthol wars fought within these urban cores. Little previous work has analyzed the way in which the inner city's complex geography of race, class, and place shaped the avenues used by tobacco corporations to increase tobacco use in low-income, predominantly African American urban cores in the 1970s–1990s. Our analysis shows how the industry's activities contributed to the racialized geography of today's tobacco-related health disparities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Marketing strategically targets consumers' values, attitudes and beliefs, 16 17”
From Tobacco industry misappropriation of American Indian culture and traditional tobacco (2018) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Race and health: Basic questions, emerging directions
Williams, D. R. (1997) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00051-3 · Cited by 825
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x · Cited by 1,572
Smoking, Mental Illness, and Public Health
Prochaska, J. J., Das, S., & Young-Wolff, K. C. (2017) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044618 · Cited by 503
“Menthol cigarettes have been aggressively marketed as healthier and safer alternatives to regular cigarettes to groups at high risk for smoking, including African Americans, Native Hawaiians, adolescents, and low-income communities (44, 47, 104, 141).”
BackgroundZota, A. R., & Shamasunder, B. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.020 · Cited by 257
Tobacco industry misappropriation of American Indian culture and traditional tobacco
D’Silva, J., O’Gara, E., & Villaluz, N. T. (2018) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053950 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Yerger, V. B., Przewoznik, J., & Malone, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 10-38
- ISSN
- 1548-6869
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review