The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"The Personal is Political," or Why Women's Rights are Indeed Human Rights: An African Perspective on International Feminism
Abstract
Human Rights Quarterly - Volume 17, Number 4, November 1995
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a feminist theory of the state
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5386 · Cited by 2,391
Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective
Young, I. M. (1994) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/494918 · Cited by 778
Cited by
Nego-Feminism: Theorizing, Practicing, and Pruning Africa's Way
Nnaemeka, O. (2004) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/378553 · Cited by 456
Enemies or Allies? Feminism and Cultural Relativism as Dissident Voices in Human Rights Discourse
Brems, E. (1997) · Human Rights Quarterly · doi:10.1353/hrq.1997.0003 · Cited by 88
Hellum, A. (1998) · The European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1080/09578819808426718 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamale, S., & Oloka-Onyango, J.
- Venue
- Human Rights Quarterly
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691-731
- ISSN
- 0275-0392 (ISSN-L)
- 1085-794X
- OpenAlex
- W2066363573
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "The Personal is Political," or Why Women's Rights are Indeed Human Rights: An African Perspective on International Feminism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/hrq.1995.0037
- The paper
- Tamale, S., & Oloka-Onyango, J. (1995). "The Personal is Political," or Why Women's Rights are Indeed Human Rights: An African Perspective on International Feminism. Human Rights Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1995.0037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
