Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 143International Human Rights and Reproductive LawHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Becoming Human: The Origins and Development of Women's Human Rights

Fraser, Arvonne S·1999·Human Rights Quarterly

Abstract

Human Rights Quarterly - Volume 21, Number 4, November 1999

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hrq.1999.0050

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Items 101–143 of 143

Metadata

Authors
Fraser, A. S.
Corresponding author
Fraser, Arvonne S
Venue
Human Rights Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
1999-11
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
853-906
ISSN
  • 0275-0392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1085-794X
OpenAlex
W2004104251
Cited by
143
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Rights Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Keywords
women's human rights, history of women's rights, gender equality, women's rights movement, human rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.