Cited by 530War, Law, and JusticeCriminal Justice and PenologyConflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia

Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation

Fletcher, Laurel E, Weinstein, Harvey M·2002·Human Rights Quarterly

Abstract

Human Rights Quarterly - Volume 24, Number 3, August 2002

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hrq.2002.0033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dominant current view is that societies seeking reconciliation should employ a variety of transitional justice mechanisms rather than just one.

    “The dominant current view is that societies seeking reconciliation should employ a variety of transitional justice mechanisms rather than just one -echoing what Fletcher and Weinstein (2002) suggested a decade ago.128”

    From Reconciliation in a Transitional Justice Perspective (2013) · cites this paper as Fletcher and Weinstein (2002)

  • Transitional justice can, under some conditions, lead to an easing of state-level repression because it sends signals to violent state agents that the old way of ruling, through surveillance and coercion, is no longer acceptable.

    “our previous work has shown that transitional justice can, under some conditions, lead to an easing of statelevel repression because it sends signals to violent state agents that the old way of ruling, through surveillance and coercion, is no longer acceptable.12”

    From Transitional Justice and the Problem of Democratic Decline (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher, L. E., & Weinstein, H. M.
Venue
Human Rights Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2002-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
573-639
ISSN
  • 0275-0392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1085-794X
OpenAlex
W2082564948
Cited by
530
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
39.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Rights Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
Keywords
social repair, justice, reconciliation, transitional justice, post-conflict societies, reparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review