Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 75International Law and Human RightsGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsWar, Law, and Justice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Impact of US Policy toward the International Criminal Court on the Prevention of Genocide, War Crimes, and Crimes Against Humanity

Johansen, Robert C·2006·Human Rights Quarterly

Abstract

The United States has undermined the effectiveness of the International Criminal Court by refusing to join or support the Court; by withholding support for UN peacekeeping unless US citizens are exempted from international enforcement arising out of such operations; by pressing other countries to sign treaties exempting US citizens from Court proceedings; by cutting US foreign assistance to selected countries unless they sign immunity agreements with Washington; and by holding victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity hostage to obtaining exemptions for US citizens. These US policies make it more difficult to enforce the laws prohibiting genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hrq.2006.0020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Johansen, R. C.
Corresponding author
Johansen, Robert C
Venue
Human Rights Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2006-05
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
301-331
ISSN
  • 0275-0392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1085-794X
OpenAlex
W2027312413
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
48.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Rights Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
Keywords
International Criminal Court, US foreign policy, genocide prevention, war crimes, crimes against humanity, UN peacekeeping, US foreign aid, international criminal law enforcement, American citizens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.