Cited by 59School Choice and PerformanceCritical Race Theory in EducationEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

The contours of tracking in North Carolina

Kelly, Sean·2007·The High School Journal

Abstract

In this analysis of North Carolina high schools the author examines school tracking policies using an amended version of Sorensen's (1970) conceptualization of the organizational dimensions of tracking. Data from curriculum guides in a stratified sample of 92 high schools reveal both consistency and variation in how tracking is implemented at the school level. Understanding the policies that promote inclusive course taking, or that affect other dimensions of tracking, such electivity and scope, is the first step to improving the implementation of tracking. Research on tracking will continue to be disconnected from school improvement efforts until the relationships between school policies, the organizational dimensions of tracking, and outcomes for students are understood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hsj.2007.0016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, S.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Sean
Venue
The High School Journal
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2007-04
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
15-31
ISSN
  • 0018-1498 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-5157
OpenAlex
W1972426257
Cited by
59
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The High School journal/The High school journal (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
educational tracking, school improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review