Genetic Variation at Apolipoprotein E Locus in Ethiopia: An E5 Variant Corresponds to Two Different Mutant Alleles: E*5 (Glu212Lys) and E*5 (Gln204Lys; Cys112Arg)
Abstract
A previous investigation on apolipoprotein E polymorphism in the Ethiopian population highlighted the presence of a further variant allele named E*5 in addition to the three common alleles. The variant is considered rare elsewhere but has a frequency of more than 1% in this population. Now characterized by gene sequencing and restriction isotyping in many members of the families of the original carriers, the variant isoform has actually been found to be determined by two different gene mutations. Effectively rare in Ethiopians, one of the two, E5 (Gln204Lys, Cys 112Arg), has never been described before. The other, E5 (Glu212Lys), previously described in a subject of Turkish origin, is present at the polymorphic level only in the Ethiopian population. No subjects bearing these variants had anomalous lipid or apolipoprotein patterns. In the course of the present investigation both have been found to occur as rare variants in the southern Italian population as well. The occurrence of the two variants in the populations of Ethiopia and of the Mediterranean basin could be explained by taking into account the relevant Caucasoid contribution to the Ethiopian gene pool.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In another study, APOE5 (Gln204Lys, Cys112Arg) and APOE5 (Glu212Lys) were found to be present at almost polymorphic levels (allele frequencies: 0.006 and 0.012-0.013, respectively) in the Ethiopian population and no subjects with these variants had abnormal lipid or apolipoprotein patterns.
“In another study, APOE5 (Gln204Lys, Cys112Arg) and APOE5 (Glu212Lys) were found to be present at almost polymorphic levels (allele frequencies: 0.006 and 0.012–0.013, respectively) in the Ethiopian population and no subjects with these variants had abnormal lipid or apolipoprotein patterns125).”
From Impact of Apolipoprotein E Variants: A Review of Naturally Occurring Variants and Clinical Features (2025) · cites this paper as [125]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of Apolipoprotein E Variants: A Review of Naturally Occurring Variants and Clinical Features
Matsunaga, A., & Saito, T. (2025) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.65393 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scacchi, R., De Stefano, G. F., Ruggeri, M., & Corbo, R. M.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council (IT)
- ORCID
- Corbo, R. M.
- Venue
- Human Biology
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-300
- ISSN
- 0018-7143 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-6617
- OpenAlex
- W2060587770
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Human Biology (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein E, genetic polymorphism, Ethiopian population, gene sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Apolipoproteins E, DNA Mutational Analysis, Ethiopia, Ethnicity, Humans, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review