The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Supply of Birth Control Methods, Education, and Fertility: Evidence from Romania
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of the supply of birth control methods on fertility behavior by examining Romania's 23-year period of pronatalist policies. Following the lifting of the restrictions in 1989 the immediate decrease in fertility was 30 percent. Women who spent most of their reproductive years under the restrictive regime experienced increases in life-cycle fertility of about 0.5 children. Less-educated women had bigger increases infertility after policy implementation and larger fertility decreases following the lifting of restrictions. These findings suggest that access to abortion and birth control are significant determinants of fertility levels, particularly for less-educated women.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One observation regarding the lack of preparation of the population for the measure of limiting abortion was promptly answered: 'I think the decree is eagerly expected. It is known about for three months. Those who wanted to make preparations for it have made them. On the contrary, among workers, peasants, intellectuals, the decree is quite expected. I feel that”
From Ceausescu’s population policy: a moral or an economic choice between compulsory and voluntary incentivised motherhood? (2013) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Family Planning Program Effects: Evidence from Microdata
Miller, G., & Babiarz, K. S. (2016) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00109.x · Cited by 87
Nutraceutical value of Carica papaya: A review
Matondo, J. D., & Abihudi, S. (2021) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00933 · Cited by 95
Prenatal Exposure to Violence and Birth Weight in Mexico
Torche, F., & Villarreal, A. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414544733 · Cited by 79
Context Matters for Size: Why External Validity Claims and Development Practice Don't MixPreprint
Pritchett, L. H., & Sandefur, J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2364580 · Cited by 73
Contraceptive Supply and Fertility Outcomes: Evidence from Ghana
Jones, K. (2015) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/682981 · Cited by 65
“For example, Pop-Eleches ð2010Þ finds that a drastic increase in the availability of modern contraceptives and abortion in Romania decreased fertility most for the least educated women.”
BackgroundInfluentialAbortion laws and women’s health
Clarke, D., & Mühlrad, H. (2020) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102413 · Cited by 67
“These include historical restrictions in Romania (PopEleches, 2010), the impact of parental consent or notification laws targeted at ado lescents in the US (Bitler and Zavodny, 2001; Joyce and Kaestner, 1996), and a recent hollowing out in the availability of providers due to statespecific legislation in the US (Fisch…”
BackgroundInfluentialAccess to abortion, investments in neonatal health, and sex-selection: Evidence from Nepal
Valente, C. (2014) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.12.002 · Cited by 40
“the abortion ban introduced in 1966 resulted in a large increase in birth rates in the short run (Pop-Eleches 2006), whilst the lifting of the ban in 1989 had the reverse effect, albeit less marked (Pop-Eleches 2010).”
BackgroundPopulation Policy: Abortion and Modern Contraception Are Substitutes
Miller, G., & Valente, C. (2016) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0492-8 · Cited by 39
CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS: A REVIEW OF FERTILITY AND CAUSALITY
Clarke, D. (2017) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12202 · Cited by 35
“…Melvin (2006), Cook et al. (1999), Currie et al. (1996), Gruber et al. (1999), Guldi (2008), Kane and Staiger (1996), Levine et al. (1996b,a, 1999), Pop-Eleches (2010) and Pop-Eleches (2006); for the oral contraceptive pill: Ananat and Hungerman (2012), Bailey (2006, 2010, 2012, 2013), Christensen…”
BackgroundThe impact of the legalisation of abortion on birth outcomes in Uruguay
Antón, J., Ferré, Z., & Triunfo, P. (2018) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3659 · Cited by 29
Does Abortion Liberalisation Accelerate Fertility Decline? A Worldwide Time-Series Analysis
Fernández, J. J., & Juif, D. (2023) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-023-09687-y · Cited by 26
“In an early analysis of this outlier case, Pop-Eleches (2010) later found that the effect of the abortion ban on fertility in Romania was longer-lasting, as women who spent most of their reproductive years under the 23-year, pro-natalist regime (1966 to 1989) experienced increases in lifecycle…”
BackgroundMethodThe impact of legalized abortion on child health outcomes and abandonment. Evidence from Romania
Mitrut, A., & Wolff, F. (2011) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.08.004 · Cited by 23
“13 Additional evidence is provided by Pop-Eleches (2005) who compares Romanian to its neighboring Moldova, and does not find similar patterns in fertility rates.”
BackgroundInfluentialInteractions Between Family and School Environments: Evidence on Dynamic Complementarities?
Goff, L., Malamud, O., Pop-Eleches, C., & Urquiola, M. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22112 · Cited by 23
Self-citationAssessing Plan B: The Effect of the Morning After Pill on Children and Women
Bentancor, A., & Clarke, D. (2016) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12390 · Cited by 18
The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children’s socioeconomic outcomes
Hajdu, G., & Hajdu, T. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248638 · Cited by 14
HEALTH INSURANCE, FERTILITY, AND THE WANTEDNESS OF PREGNANCIES: EVIDENCE FROM MASSACHUSETTS
Apostolova‐Mihaylova, M., & Yelowitz, A. S. (2017) · Contemporary Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/coep.12235 · Cited by 15
Abortion Legalization in Uruguay: Effects on Adolescent Fertility
Cabella, W., & Velázquez, C. (2022) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/sifp.12204 · Cited by 13
“…effects among adolescents and poorer women; see Bailey and Lindo (2018) for the US; González et al. (2018) for Spain; Mølland (2016) for Norway; Valente (2014) for Nepal; Pop-Eleches (2010, 2006) for Romania; and Clarke and Mühlrad (2016) and Gutiérrez-Vázquez and Parrado (2016) for Mexico City.”
Evolution of adolescent fertility after decriminalization of abortion in Montevideo, Uruguay
Antón, J., Ferré, Z., & Triunfo, P. (2016) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.06.002 · Cited by 12
The children of the missed pill
Rau, T., Sarzosa, M., & Urzúa, S. (2021) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102496 · Cited by 14
The Impact of Being Denied a Wanted Abortion on Women and Their Children
Vélez, J. L., & Saravia, E. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf006 · Cited by 9
Assessing Plan B: The Effect of the Morning after Pill on Children and WomenPreprint
Bentancor, A., & Clarke, D. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2468141 · Cited by 9
Soare, F. S. (2013) · European Journal of Government and Economics · doi:10.17979/ejge.2013.2.1.4287 · Cited by 7
Family Planning: Program Effects
Miller, G., & Babiarz, K. S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.31036-4 · Cited by 7
“…countries limited or banned abortion during the 1980s and 1990s.23 Examining the abrupt end of Romania’s ban on abortion and family planning in 1989, Pop-Eleches (2010) uses survey data on births among reproductive age women two years before and after the end of the ban to employ a single…”
MethodInfluentialThe Effect of Mass Incarceration on Criminality in Colombia
Ruiz, J. F. F. (2021) · International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy · doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.1644 · Cited by 6
The Children of the Missed Pill
Rau, T., Sarzosa, M., & Urzúa, S. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23911 · Cited by 6
“35 Examining the case of Romania, Pop-Eleches (2010) provides evidence on the fact that intentional abortion is a relatively common birth control mechanism that has significant impacts on fertility.”
The Effect of Access to Legal Abortion on Fertility, Marriage and Long-term Outcomes for Women
González, L., Jiménez‐Martín, S., Nollenberger, N., et al. (2025) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueaf054 · Cited by 5
To What Extent Does the Fertility Rate Explain the Education Gap?
Sen, G., Surana, M., & Basant, R. (2023) · Population Research and Policy Review · doi:10.1007/s11113-023-09783-1 · Cited by 5
“High fertility could be a consequence of inadequate access to contraception (Jones, 2015; Pop-Eleches, 2010).”
BackgroundTo Pill or Not to Pill? Access to Emergency Contraception and Contraceptive BehaviourPreprint
Nuevo‐Chiquero, A., & Pino, F. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3323191 · Cited by 5
“In developed countries, the introduction of modern contraceptive methods (the pill) reduced the risk of pregnancy, freeing women and partners from the cost of unwanted fertility (Goldin, 1990; Pop-Eleches, 2010).”
Population Policy: Abortion and Modern Contraception are Substitutes
Miller, G., & Valente, C. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22085 · Cited by 5
Seyedtabib, M., Mahjub, H., Mahmoudi, M., & Moghimbeigi, A. (2021) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.47176/mjiri.35.38 · Cited by 4
“Another main factor in our findings was the role of contraceptive use in decreasing the expected number of children which were found in the others studies (21, 50).”
Policymakers’ Abortion Preferences: Understanding the Intersection of Gender and Wealth
Arriola, L. R., Choi, D. D., Davis, J., Phillips, M. L., & Rakner, L. (2024) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140241237452 · Cited by 3
“Women who can acquire and spend their own money are more likely to exercise a greater range of options for managing family planning, whether prior to the onset of pregnancy or afterward (Pop-Eleches, 2010).”
Estefan, A. (2025) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2025.2569395 · Cited by 2
“The evidence spans a wide range of countries, including but not limited to Ethiopia (P € ortner, Beegle, & Christiaensen, 2011), Indonesia (Angeles, Guilkey, & Mroz, 2005b; Gertler & Molyneaux, 1994, 2000; Pitt, Rosenzweig, & Gibbons, 1993), Peru (Angeles, Guilkey, & Mroz, 2005a), Iran (Salehi-Isfahani, Abbasi-Shavazi…”
Bretonnière, S. (2014) · Enfances Familles Générations · doi:10.7202/1025962ar · Cited by 2
“La courbe de fécondité grimpa de manière spectaculaire à la fin des années 1960 (Blayo, 1970; Pop-Eleches, 2006, 2010).”
BackgroundWomen's Education: An Important Tool for Birth Reduction? A GMM - Poisson Regression Model Approach
Yedan, A. (2020) · Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.14738/assrj.71.7673 · Cited by 1
Analysis of the Demographic Phenomenon of Fertility in Romania from 1950-2021
Cârstea, A. L., & Domnariu, C. D. (2021) · Acta Medica Transilvanica · doi:10.2478/amtsb-2021-0059 · Cited by 1
Do Changes in Condom Availability Affect Short-Term Fertility? Evidence from Rwanda
Mello, S. (2012) · The American Economist · doi:10.1177/056943451205700202
“Also analyzing changes ensuing from shifts in family-planning policy, Pop-Eleches (2006, 2010) determines the impact of drastic abortion policy changes in Romania.”
BackgroundFecundidad adolescente y educación ¿causa o consecuencia?
Battistessa, C. V. (2019) · doi:10.35537/10915/74463
Three Essays on Labor and Demographic Economics
Hiriscau, A. (2021) · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc010206
Legal status and voluntary abortions by immigrants
Pieroni, L., Roig, M. R., Salmasi, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103001
Abortion Ban and the Next Generation’s Family Formation Decisions: Evidence from Romania
Köksal, S., Balbo, N., & Billari, F. C. (2026) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-026-09768-8
“…women, as they were using abortion services more frequently due to their lower fertility intentions (Pop-Eleches, 2006), the ban took a higher toll on poorer women who lacked the means to seek abortions elsewhere and the resources to care for another child (Kligman, 1998; Pop-Eleches, 2010).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Pop-Eleches, C.
- Corresponding author
- Pop-Eleches, Cristian
- Venue
- Journal of Human Resources
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 971-997
- ISSN
- 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8004
- OpenAlex
- W4231258019
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- contraception, fertility, pronatalist policy, abortion access, fertility education, educational attainment, infertility, Romania, post-communist transition, fertility decline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review