Cited by 96Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformancePoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

When opportunity knocks, who answers? New evidence on college achievement awards

Open access
Angrist, Joshua, Oreopoulos, Philip, Williams, Tyler·2014·Journal of Human Resources

Abstract

We evaluate the effects of academic achievement awards for first and second-year college students on a Canadian commuter campus.The award scheme offered linear cash incentives for course grades above 70.Awards were paid every term.Program participants also had access to peer advising by upperclassmen.Program engagement appears to have been high but overall treatment effects were small.The intervention increased the number of courses graded above 70 and points earned above 70 for second-year students, but there was no significant effect on overall GPA.Results are somewhat stronger for a subsample that correctly described the program rules.We argue that these results fit in with an emerging picture of mostly modest effects for cash award programs of this type at the post-secondary level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jhr.2014.0019

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Canadian STAR program effects were stronger among students who could more accurately describe program requirements.

    “Angrist, Oreopoulos, and Williams (2014) found that the Canadian STAR program's effects were stronger among students who could more accurately describe program requirements.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Angrist, Oreopoulos, and Williams (2014)

    The Summary and Conclusions report a stronger response among students who understood the award scheme, but this finding concerns Opportunity Knocks (OK), not STAR. Background and Research Design identifies STAR as an earlier, distinct program; the paper does not report this understanding-related finding for STAR. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Canadian STAR performance-based scholarship had only limited positive effects on academic outcomes.

    “the Canadian STAR performance-based scholarship had only limited positive effects on academic outcomes (Angrist, Oreopoulos, and Williams, 2014).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Angrist, Oreopoulos, and Williams, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Angrist, Joshua, Eric Bettinger, Erik Bloom, Elizabeth King, and Michael Kremer. 2002. "Vouchers for Private Schooling in Columbia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment." American Economic Review, 92: 1535-1558.
  2. Angrist, Joshua, Daniel Lang, and Philip Oreopoulos. 2009. "Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1): 136-63.
  3. Angrist, Joshua D., and Victor Lavy. 2009. "The Effect of High School Matriculation Awards: Evidence from a Randomized Trial." American Economic Review, 99(4): 1384-1414.
  4. Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Ashenfelter, Orley, and Mark W. Plant. 1990. "Nonparametric Estimates of the Labor-Supply Effects of Negative Income Tax Programs." Journal of Labor Economics, 8(1, Part 2: Essays in Honor of Albert Rees): S396-S415.
  6. Bettinger, Eric P., and Bridget Terry Long. 2009. "Addressing the Needs of Under-Prepared Students in Higher Education: Does College Remediation Work?" Journal of Human Resources, 44(3): 736-771.
  7. Deardon, Lorraine, Carl Emmerson, Christine Frayne, and Costas Meghir. 2009. "Conditional Cash Transfers and School Dropout Rates." Journal of Human Resources, 44(4): 827-857.
  8. Dynarski, Susan. 2004. "The New Merit Aid." In College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It, edited by Caroline M. Hoxby, 63-100. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  9. Henry, Gary T., and Ross Rubinstein. 2002. "Paying for Grades: Impact of Merit-Based Financial Aid on Education Quality." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21: 93-109.
  10. Holmstrom, Bengt, and Paul Milgrom. 1987. "Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives." Econometrica, 55(2): 303-328.
  11. Kremer, Michael, Edward Miguel, and Rebecca Thornton. 2009. "Incentives to Learn." The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3): 437-456.
  12. Pallais, Amanda. 2009. "Taking a Chance on College: Is the Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program a Winner?" The Journal of Human Resources, 44(1): 199-222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angrist, J., Oreopoulos, P., & Williams, T.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Human Resources
Published
2014
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
572-610
ISSN
  • 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8004
OpenAlex
W2215668497
Cited by
96
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Other univ. web domain
Funders
Spencer Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
cash incentives, university students, peer advising, grade point average, student engagement, incentive effectiveness, postsecondary education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review