Cited by 2Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionChinese history and philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

The Figure of Baozhi (418-524): A Model for the Buddhist Historiography of the Koryŏ Dynasty?

Bruneton, Yannick·2012·Journal of Korean Religions

Abstract

The present paper represents the first step of an appraisal of the influence, in the Korean historiographic tradition, of the archetypal model of Baozhi as a textual and religious paradigm. It shows that, even if the references in Korean sources to Baozhi, the Liang Dhyāna master, are scant ("literary motif" in literati works, Biographies of the monks Wŏnhyo, Yangji and Podŏk in the Samguk yusa , legends of the founding of the Haein and Kyŏnam Temples as transmitted by the Naong School), the fact remains that he had an indelible influence on the pre-modern Buddhist historiography of Korea. In the written culture of Koryŏ and Chosŏn, the paradigmatic figure of Baozhi generally functioned in the same way as in China. However, it would seem that each period selectively adopted one or another of the archetypal functions that characterized the monk, influenced by the construction Baozhi's myth in China, but also depending upon the political and social position of Buddhism on the Korean peninsula. During the Koryŏ period, Baozhi's influence was the strongest as one of the models that went into the development of the myth of Tosŏn (the monk-prophet legitimizing the establishment of the dynasty and initiator of Buddhist construction).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jkr.2012.0019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 8 · Cited by 2

Metadata

Authors
Bruneton, Y.
Corresponding author
Bruneton, Yannick
Venue
Journal of Korean Religions
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2012-10
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
117-151
ISSN
  • 2093-7288 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-2040
OpenAlex
W2126949474
Cited by
2
References
8
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Korean religions (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
Buddhist historiography, Goryeo dynasty, Chinese Buddhist monks, Liang dynasty, Samguk Yusa, Wonhyo, Chinese-Korean cultural exchange, archetypal figures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Figure of Baozhi (418-524): A Model for the Buddhist Historiography of the Koryŏ Dynasty? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/jkr.2012.0019
The paper
Bruneton, Y. (2012). The Figure of Baozhi (418-524): A Model for the Buddhist Historiography of the Koryŏ Dynasty? Journal of Korean Religions. https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2012.0019