The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
The Figure of Baozhi (418-524): A Model for the Buddhist Historiography of the Koryŏ Dynasty?
Abstract
The present paper represents the first step of an appraisal of the influence, in the Korean historiographic tradition, of the archetypal model of Baozhi as a textual and religious paradigm. It shows that, even if the references in Korean sources to Baozhi, the Liang Dhyāna master, are scant ("literary motif" in literati works, Biographies of the monks Wŏnhyo, Yangji and Podŏk in the Samguk yusa , legends of the founding of the Haein and Kyŏnam Temples as transmitted by the Naong School), the fact remains that he had an indelible influence on the pre-modern Buddhist historiography of Korea. In the written culture of Koryŏ and Chosŏn, the paradigmatic figure of Baozhi generally functioned in the same way as in China. However, it would seem that each period selectively adopted one or another of the archetypal functions that characterized the monk, influenced by the construction Baozhi's myth in China, but also depending upon the political and social position of Buddhism on the Korean peninsula. During the Koryŏ period, Baozhi's influence was the strongest as one of the models that went into the development of the myth of Tosŏn (the monk-prophet legitimizing the establishment of the dynasty and initiator of Buddhist construction).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“a work falsely attributed to the historical monk Baozhi 寶誌 (418-514).”
From On the Concept of Effortlessness and Non-Activity in Medieval Chinese Buddhist Practice, with Focus on Chan During the Tang (2026) · cites this paper as Bruneton (2012)
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruneton, Y.
- Corresponding author
- Bruneton, Yannick
- Venue
- Journal of Korean Religions
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-151
- ISSN
- 2093-7288 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-2040
- OpenAlex
- W2126949474
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Korean religions (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- Buddhist historiography, Goryeo dynasty, Chinese Buddhist monks, Liang dynasty, Samguk Yusa, Wonhyo, Chinese-Korean cultural exchange, archetypal figures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Figure of Baozhi (418-524): A Model for the Buddhist Historiography of the Koryŏ Dynasty? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/jkr.2012.0019
- The paper
- Bruneton, Y. (2012). The Figure of Baozhi (418-524): A Model for the Buddhist Historiography of the Koryŏ Dynasty? Journal of Korean Religions. https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2012.0019