The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Malawi's New Dawn
Abstract
Journal of Democracy - Volume 6, Number 1, January 1995
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“His response was to mobilize Chewas as Chewas , and to do so in large part by invoking the threat posed to the community by its Tumbuka rivals (Kaspin 1995; Posner 1995).”
From The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi (2004) · cites this paper as Posner 1995
In the citing paper
“In the 1994 contest in Malawi, meanwhile, the country split its vote almost exactly along ethnic lines, with Chewa voters from the Central Region overwhelmingly supporting Banda's Malawi Congress Party (MCP), Tumbuka voters from the Northern Region overwhelmingly supporting the Tumbuka-led Alliance for Democracy (AFORD), and almost no crossover voting taking place between the two communities (Kasp”
From The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi (2004) · cites this paper as Posner 1995
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 1 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Posner, D. N.
- Corresponding author
- Posner, Daniel N
- ORCID
- Posner, Daniel N
- Venue
- Journal of Democracy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-145
- ISSN
- 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3214
- OpenAlex
- W2026654003
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Keywords
- Malawi, democratization, political transition, post-apartheid transition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malawi's New Dawn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/jod.1995.0017
- The paper
- Posner, D. N. (1995). Malawi's New Dawn. Journal of Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0017
