Fundamentalism and the family: gender, culture, and the American Pro-Family Movement
Abstract
Within a historical perspective, the relationship between fundamentalism and the recent pro-family movement is complex. From the time of their origins in the late nineteenth century until World War II, fundamentalists said little about the family except as a means of deepening the lines of separation with the surrounding culture. If anything, moderate and liberal Protestants owned the family issue, for they emphasized "Christian nurture" and religious education in the home. The moment of shift in fundamentalism toward a pro-family orientation was the neo-evangelical revival of the 1940s and 1950s, which repudiated the militant separatism of fundamentalism and moved in a direction of more positive cultural engagement. The middle-class family of the 1950s was a powerful symbol of respect-ability and morality, and evangelicals embraced this image in the 1960s and 1970s. But conservative Protestants soon encountered a series of events—Supreme Court rulings on school prayer and abortion, and the sex education movement—that they believed challenged the moral autonomy of the family. The political agenda of the pro-family movement grew in response to these circumstances, but within a pattern of engagement already set by the historical and theological legacy of fundamentalism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Movements on behalf of sexual rights have encountered a powerful reactionary response in traditionalist movements rallying for conservative family values and religious beliefs.
“Movements on behalf of sexual rights have encountered a powerful reactionary response in traditionalist movements rallying for conservative family values and religious beliefs (Lamberts-Bendroth, 1999;Ratzinger, 2003Ratzinger, , 2004;;Marty, 1988).”
From From global discourse to local action: the makings of a sexual rights movement? (2006) · cites this paper as Lamberts-Bendroth, 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Bendroth, M. L.
- Corresponding author
- Bendroth, Margaret Lamberts
- Venue
- Journal of women's history
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 35-54
- ISSN
- 1042-7961 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-2036
- OpenAlex
- W2153396266
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of women's history (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- religious fundamentalism, American families, gender, culture wars, neo-evangelicalism, conservative Protestants, Christian nurture, religious education, school prayer, abortion, sex education, respectability, moral autonomy, middle-class families, women in religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review