Cited by 30Religion and Society InteractionsReligion, Gender, and EnlightenmentReligion and Society in Latin America

Fundamentalism and the family: gender, culture, and the American Pro-Family Movement

Bendroth, Margaret Lamberts·1999·Journal of women's history

Abstract

Within a historical perspective, the relationship between fundamentalism and the recent pro-family movement is complex. From the time of their origins in the late nineteenth century until World War II, fundamentalists said little about the family except as a means of deepening the lines of separation with the surrounding culture. If anything, moderate and liberal Protestants owned the family issue, for they emphasized "Christian nurture" and religious education in the home. The moment of shift in fundamentalism toward a pro-family orientation was the neo-evangelical revival of the 1940s and 1950s, which repudiated the militant separatism of fundamentalism and moved in a direction of more positive cultural engagement. The middle-class family of the 1950s was a powerful symbol of respect-ability and morality, and evangelicals embraced this image in the 1960s and 1970s. But conservative Protestants soon encountered a series of events—Supreme Court rulings on school prayer and abortion, and the sex education movement—that they believed challenged the moral autonomy of the family. The political agenda of the pro-family movement grew in response to these circumstances, but within a pattern of engagement already set by the historical and theological legacy of fundamentalism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jowh.2010.0537

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Movements on behalf of sexual rights have encountered a powerful reactionary response in traditionalist movements rallying for conservative family values and religious beliefs.

    “Movements on behalf of sexual rights have encountered a powerful reactionary response in traditionalist movements rallying for conservative family values and religious beliefs (Lamberts-Bendroth, 1999;Ratzinger, 2003Ratzinger, , 2004;;Marty, 1988).”

    From From global discourse to local action: the makings of a sexual rights movement? (2006) · cites this paper as Lamberts-Bendroth, 1999

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 30

Authors
Bendroth, M. L.
Corresponding author
Bendroth, Margaret Lamberts
Venue
Journal of women's history
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
1999-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
35-54
ISSN
  • 1042-7961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-2036
OpenAlex
W2153396266
Cited by
30
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of women's history (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
Keywords
religious fundamentalism, American families, gender, culture wars, neo-evangelicalism, conservative Protestants, Christian nurture, religious education, school prayer, abortion, sex education, respectability, moral autonomy, middle-class families, women in religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review