Cited by 10Japanese History and CultureKorean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ancient Japan's Korean Connection

Farris, William Wayne·1996·Korean Studies

Abstract

This article analyzes relations among the peoples of the Korean peninsula and the Japanese archipelago between A.D. 350 and 700 from an archaeological perspective. Until recently, the international academic community was divided between those who advocated the "horserider theory" and those who argued that the Japanese court (located in the Kinai) controlled the three southern Korean states of Kaya, Paekche, and Shilla between 350 and 562. This work seeks a middle position consistent with all the evidence. Scholars from Japan, South Korea, China, Western Europe, and the United States have shown that the peninsular peoples transmitted a huge volume of materials, technologies, ideas, and institutions to the archipelago. These items included: iron and iron-working techniques, iron weapons and armor, horse trappings, new agricultural tools and practices, stoneware, the household oven, gold and silver metallurgy, stone-fitting methods, silk-weaving, writing, plans for mountain fortifications, the crossbow, Buddhism and its architecture, and methods of statecraft such as the be, kabane , law codes, and ranking. Peoples of the Korean peninsula acted as middlemen, often altering or refining ideas that originated elsewhere. Four mechanisms encouraged the influx: minimal trade, large-scale immigration, some plundering by Japanese troops fighting in Korea, and the foreign policies of states such as Paekche and Koguryŏ. Japanese chieftains anxious to receive technology transfers from the…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/ks.1996.0015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Farris, W. W.
Corresponding author
Farris, William Wayne
Venue
Korean Studies
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
1996
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0145-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-1529
OpenAlex
W2169817725
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Korean studies (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Japan-Korea relations, Korean Peninsula, Japanese islands, Kaya, Baekje, Koguryo, technology transfer, ironworking, silk weaving, Buddhism, crossbow, statecraft, immigration, military intervention, complex states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review