Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating Amazonian Indian Numbers in 1492

Denevan, William M.·2014·Journal of Latin American Geography

Abstract

Desde 1965 he hecho varios intentos para estimar la población nativa de la Amazonía en 1492. Mi método original fue determinar las densidades de cada hábitat, que se proyectan a los totales para la Gran Amazonia de 5.1 a 6. 8 millones. Ahora he rechazado este método, dado que las poblaciones más densas se agruparon sobre todo en vez de uniformemente dispersado. Sin embargo, sigo creyendo que un total de, al menos, cinco y seis millones es razonable, y hasta diez millones cuando se consideran densas poblaciones mantenidas por la terra preta .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/lag.2014.0036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Denevan, W. M.
Venue
Journal of Latin American Geography
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2014
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
207-221
ISSN
1548-5811
Cited by
47
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review