The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse
Abstract
We use the variationist method to elucidate the expression of future time in English, examining multiple grammaticalization in the same domain ( will and going to). Usage patterns show that the choice of form is not determined by invariant semantic readings such as proximity, certainty, willingness, or intention. Rather, particular instances of each general construction occupy lexical, syntactic, and pragmatic niches. While putative differences in meaning are largely neutralized in discourse, grammaticalization paths are reflected in particular constructions of different degrees of lexical specificity, which bear different nuances of meaning or tenacious patterns of distribution inherited from once-meaningful associations. We conclude that collocations contribute to the shape of grammatical variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
Winters, M. E., & Langacker, R. W. (1988) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327796 · Cited by 5,665
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
Freidin, R., & Jackendoff, R. S. (1975) · Language · doi:10.2307/413161 · Cited by 4,615
Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1385 · Cited by 4,458
(2006) · Cited by 3,931
The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4321 · Cited by 3,820
Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience1
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997) · Journal of Narrative and Life History · doi:10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar · Cited by 3,300
Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1980.0017 · Cited by 3,239
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613463 · Cited by 2,930
From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition
Bybee, J. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0186 · Cited by 2,786
Fillmore, C. J. (1967) · Cited by 2,781
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization
(2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.001.0001 · Cited by 953
The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING)
Forrest, J. (2017) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394517000072 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Cacoullos, R. T., & Walker, J. A.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 321-354
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-0665
- OpenAlex
- W2030895583
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 298.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/lan.0.0110
- The paper
- Cacoullos, R. T., & Walker, J. A. (2009). The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.