CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 213Classical Studies and PhilologyHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesPhilosophy, History, and Historiography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A History of the New Philology and the New Philology in History

Restall, Matthew·2003·Latin American Research Review
DOI 10.1353/lar.2003.0012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Of all the rich fields of study that the history of Mexico offers, none have superseded colonial ethnohistory over the long term in the steady distinction of its scholarship. (Kicza 1995, 240)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/lar.2003.0012

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 213

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Restall, M.
Corresponding author
Restall, Matthew
Venue
Latin American Research Review
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2003
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
113-134
ISSN
  • 0023-8791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4278
DOI
10.1353/lar.2003.0012
OpenAlex
W2088337354
Cited by
213
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Latin American Research Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Keywords
New Philology, historiography, Mexican history, Mexican historiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A History of the New Philology and the New Philology in History. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/lar.2003.0012
The paper
Restall, M. (2003). A History of the New Philology and the New Philology in History. Latin American Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2003.0012