Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Chinese history and philosophyReformation and Early Modern ChristianityMedieval and Early Modern Justice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Heresy and Persecution in Late Ming Society: Reinterpreting the Case of Li Zhi

Jiang, Jin·2001·Late Imperial China

Abstract

Late Imperial China - Volume 22, Number 2, December 2001

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/late.2001.0009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, J.
Corresponding author
Jiang, Jin
Venue
Late Imperial China
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2001-12
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
1-34
ISSN
  • 0884-3236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3257
OpenAlex
W2085012985
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Late imperial China (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
Keywords
Li Zhi, heresy, religious persecution, late Ming dynasty, Daoism, Confucian orthodoxy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.