Web Accessibility
Abstract
The increasing provision of Web-based information resources has moved from a simple text interface to dynamic and interactive designs. While this move has provided people with a more creative and flexible experience, there are dangers that some people will be excluded because they cannot use standard methods of access. Research has shown that people with disabilities are most at risk of being excluded from access, and in particular people who are blind or visually impaired and who use assistive technologies such as screen readers. In a library environment, ensuring access for all is important because the method of delivery is predominantly Web-based and the development of e-book provision will provide increased opportunities to access library services remotely. This article reviews some key issues relating to Web accessibility, identifying methods of access, principles of accessibility and usability, and how Web accessibility can be assessed. Studies show that despite a growing awareness of Web accessibility issues, people are still experiencing barriers to access. Research initiatives identified in this article, and the development of the W3C WAI WCAG version 2.0, show that the research momentum is being maintained, and together with specific library-oriented research this can only be positive for the development of the profession's practice in this area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blind people face challenges interacting with Web sites and applications, primarily because current Web technology lacks accessibility and usability.
“For the 45 million blind people around the world, interacting with Web sites and Web applications is a challenging task (Theofanos and Redish, 2003;Erin, 2006;Brophy and Craven, 2007;Lazar et al., 2007).This is primarily due to a lack of accessibility and usability in current Web technology (Gerber and Kirchner, 2001;Theofanos and Redish, 2003;Di Blas et al. 2004;Correani et al., 2004;Leuthold et”
From Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems (2010) · cites this paper as Brophy and Craven, 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 100
- Authors
- Brophy, P., & Craven, J.
- ORCID
- Brophy, Peter
- Venue
- Library Trends
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 950-972
- ISSN
- 0024-2594 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-0682
- OpenAlex
- W4247751313
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Library trends (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Keywords
- web accessibility, people with disabilities, blind and visually impaired users, screen readers, assistive technology, usability, accessibility evaluation, e-books, library services, digital inclusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review