The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender and the Monstrous in El burlador de Sevilla
Abstract
In his 1611 Tesoro de la lengua castellana o española, Sebastián de Covarrubias defines "monstruo" as "cualquier parto contra la regla y orden natural" (761). Covarrubias's definition reveals his culture's understanding of the presumably feminine source of the monstrous for any biology in which females give birth. The relative disorder associated with Woman indirectly manifest in this dictionary entry is directly apparent in documents such as seventeenth-century prescriptive literature and pragmáticas against male effeminate behavior. 1 Such references provide ample evidence of how gender constituted one of the most rigid categories of "la regla y orden natural" through which baroque Spanish society proposed to sustain and reproduce itself. The young, virile, and vicious protagonist of El burlador de Sevilla challenges dominant precepts of natural order by executing a dualistic performance comprised of both Female and Male attributes. Losing the challenge costs him his life, at the same time it guarantees his character a prominent place in western cultural history. Specifically, Don Juan performs negative cultural assignations of Woman while executing the positive features of Man, with the result that the [End Page 267] feminine traits of his character assure his damnation and his masculine properties render him heroic for posterity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To be a monster is to exist in/as flesh that extends beyond the 'natural' limits of corporeal normativity, pushing the boundaries of eroticism and rationality.
“To be a monster is to exist in/as flesh that extends beyond the 'natural' limits of corporeal normativity, pushing the boundaries of eroticism and rationality (Rhodes 2002).”
From I Monster: Embodying Trans and Travesti Resistance in Latin America (2020) · cites this paper as Rhodes 2002
Citations
Cites
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3245
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
I Monster: Embodying Trans and Travesti Resistance in Latin America
Pierce, J. M. (2020) · Latin American Research Review · doi:10.25222/larr.563 · Cited by 42
“To be a monster is to exist in/as flesh that extends beyond the “natural” limits of corporeal normativity, pushing the boundaries of eroticism and rationality (Rhodes 2002).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhodes, E.
- Corresponding author
- Rhodes, Elizabeth
- ORCID
- Rhodes, Elizabeth
- Venue
- MLN
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-285
- ISSN
- 0026-7910 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-6598
- OpenAlex
- W2002452034
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MLN (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Early Modern Spanish Literature
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Renaissance Literature and Culture
- Keywords
- El burlador de Sevilla, Don Juan, gender, the monstrous, Sebastián de Covarrubias, Tesoro de la lengua castellana, female births, natural order, Pragmatica, Don Juan Tenorio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review