Beyond hurt feelings: investigating why some victims of bullying are at greater risk for suicidal ideation
Abstract
This study investigated why some adolescents who are victimized through peer bullying are more negatively impacted than others. Drawing from research on peer victimization and suicidology, two theoretically derived models were investigated, one examining social hopelessness as a risk factor, the other examining social support as a protective factor, both seeking to explain potential paths between victimization and suicidal ideation. Students in Grades 8–10 (N = 399) completed self-report measures of victimization, suicidal ideation, hopelessness (general and social), and perceived social support (from family and friends). Results indicated that social hopelessness partially mediated the relation between victimization and suicidal ideation, suggesting that one potential mechanism by which victimized students become suicidal is through victimization's impact on social hopelessness. The more socially hopeless someone becomes, the greater is their risk for having suicidal thoughts. Findings also revealed that perceived social support buffered the relation between victimization and suicidal ideation, such that victimized students with higher perceived social support from family reported lower levels of suicidal ideation than did students with lower perceived social support.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research testing the stress-buffering model has yielded mixed results.
“Research testing the stress-buffering model has yielded mixed results”
From Neural Activation to Parental Praise Interacts With Social Context to Predict Adolescent Depressive Symptoms (2019) · cites this paper as Bonanno and Hymel, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Bonanno, R. A., & Hymel, S.
- Affiliations
- Dowling College (US)
- ORCID
- Shelley Hymel
- Venue
- Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-440
- ISSN
- 0272-930X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2085795541
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Merrill-palmer Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Human Biology (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- peer bullying, suicidal ideation, perceived social support, adolescent victimization, mediation, moderation, protective factors, risk factors, family support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review