Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Classical Antiquity StudiesClassical Studies and PhilologyFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 6 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Neoanalysis and Oral Tradition in Homeric Studies

Open access
Finkelberg, Margalit·2003·Oral Tradition

Abstract

By oral tradition I understand the transmission from one generation to another of verbal messages of any kind carried out without recourse to writing, whether because this medium is unavailable or by deliberate choice. The messages can be transmitted verbatim or re-created anew at the time of delivery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/ort.2004.0014

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

2 Not checked yet · 1 Own interpretation

Show all 3 claims

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Finkelberg, M.
Corresponding author
Finkelberg, Margalit
Venue
Oral Tradition
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2003-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
68-69
ISSN
  • 0883-5365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4308
OpenAlex
W1985769565
Cited by
6
References
9
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oral tradition (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Keywords
neoanalysis, Homeric studies, oral transmission, verbal messages, Homeric epic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review