Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Immediate Hypersensitivity: A Defense against Arthropods?

Stebbings, James H.·1974·Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY: A DEFENSE AGAINST ARTHROPODS? JAMES H. STEBBINGS, JR.* It is known, but not widely recognized, that many reactions to insect bites are immediate hypersensitivity reactions [1, p. 146; 2]; that these reactions are far more common than hay fever, asthma, and other immediate hypersensitivity reactions of clinical importance is indisputable . I propose the hypothesis that a major function of the immediate hypersensitivity reactions has been the protection of terrestrial vertebrates from the bites of, or invasion by, arthropods. Beyond the obvious notion that the most common agent inducing a biological response may be a clue as to the function of that response, two observations induced me to pursue the line of thought presented in this paper. Since the time of Osier [3] hay fever has been considered a product of modern culture; Burnet has commented on its apparent increase in recent decades [4, p. 142]. A concurrent decrease in frequency of insect bites, and presumably of the immediate hypersensitivity reactions which often follow, has not been quantified but is scarcely deniable. Second, a frequent, readily observable, and presumably beneficial function of the immediate hypersensitivity reaction to insect bites in man is the inducement of avoidance behavior. The natural functions of reagirne antibodies, or immunoglobulin E, have remained obscure despite their clinical importance as mediators of atopic diseases [5; 6, p. 31]. Elevated serum IgE levels h…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pbm.1974.0027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stebbings, J. H.
Venue
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
1974-12
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
233-241
ISSN
1529-8795
Cited by
35
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review