Cited by 18Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionBiblical Studies and Interpretation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Literal Means and Hidden Meanings: A New Analysis of Skillful Means

Federman, Asaf·2009·Philosophy East and West

Abstract

The Buddhist concept of skillful means , as introduced inMahāyāna sūtras, exposes a new awareness of the gap between text and meaning. Although the term is sometimes taken to point to the Buddha's pedagogical skills, this interpretation ignores the provocative use of the term in Mahāyāna texts. Treating skillful means as a universal Buddhist concept also fails to explain why and for what purpose it first became predominant in the Mahāyāna. Looking at the use of skillful means in the Lotus Sūtra and in the Skill in Means Sūtra reveals a hermeneutic device aimed at criticizing an existing corpus of Buddhist literature. As such, skillful means is used to demonstrate that the old doctrine and the life of the Buddha contained fictitious features and were nothing but skillful means. This indicates a growing awareness of a gap between literal expressions and their hidden meaning that can only arise after some kind of religious corpus has been established.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pew.0.0050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Conze, Edward, trans. 1968. Selected Sayings from the Perfection of Wisdom. 2nd ed. London: The Buddhist Society.
  2. Gethin, Rupert. 1998. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Gombrich, Richard. 1990. ''How the Maha ¯ya ¯na Began.'' In The Buddhist Forum 1, edited by Tadeusz Skorupski, pp. 21-30. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
  4. ---. 1996. How Buddhism Began. London: Athlone Press.
  5. Harrison, Paul. 2003. ''Medium and Messages-Reflection on the Production of Maha ¯ya ¯na Su ¯ tras.'' Eastern Buddhist , 35(1-2), pp. 115-151.
  6. Hurvitz, Leon, trans. 1976. Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma. New York: Columbia University Press.
  7. Keown, Damien. 1998. ''Paternalism in the Lotus Su ¯ tra. '' Journal of Buddhist Ethics 5: 190-207.
  8. Kern, H., trans. 1884/1963. Saddharmapun ˙ d ˙ arı ¯ka or the Lotus of the True Law. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications.
  9. Kubo, Tsugunari. 2008. ''Bodhi and Anuttara-Samyak-Sambodhi in the Lotus Sutra.'' Paper presented at the XVth International Association of Buddhist Studies Conference, Atlanta, June 28.
  10. Kubo, Tsugunari, and Akira Yuyama, trans. 1993. The Lotus Sutra: Translated from the Chinese of Kuma ¯rajı ¯va. Berkeley: Bukkyo ¯ Dendo ¯ Kyo ¯ kai and Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research.
  11. Morris, R. 1897. An ˙guttara-Nika ¯ya, Vol. 3, London: Pa ¯li Text Society. Reprint edition 1994.
  12. Pye, Michael. 1978/2003. Skilful Means-A Concept in Mahayana Buddhism. London: Routledge.
  13. Rhys Davids, T. W., and William Stede. 1921-1925. The Pa ¯li English Dictionary. Oxford: Pa ¯li Text Society.
  14. Schroeder, John W. 2002. ''Na ¯ga ¯rjuna and the Doctrine of 'Skillful Means.''' Philosophy East and West 50 (4): 559-583.
  15. Tatz, M., trans. 1994. The Skill in Means (Upa ¯yakaus ´alya) Su ¯ tra. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  16. Trenckner V., ed. 1925. Majjhimanika ¯ya. Vol. 1. London: Pa ¯li Text Society.
  17. Watson, Burton, trans. 1993. The Lotus Sutra. New York: Columbia University Press.
  18. Williams, Paul. 1989. Maha ¯ya ¯ na Buddhism-The Doctrinal Foundations. London: Routledge.
  19. ---. 2000. Buddhist Thought-A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. London: Routledge.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Federman, A.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Federman, Asaf
Venue
Philosophy East and West
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2009-04
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
125-141
ISSN
  • 0031-8221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-1898
OpenAlex
W2106083752
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy East and West (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
skillful means, Mahayana Buddhism, Lotus Sutra, hermeneutics, text and meaning, Buddhist sutras

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review