Cited by 112Chinese history and philosophyPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryPolitical Philosophy and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism

Chan, Joseph·2002·Philosophy East and West

Abstract

Analyzes the associations among moral autonomy, civil liberties and Confucianism. Concept of moral autonomy; Elements of moral living; Application of moral autonomy in Confucian ethics; Theories of freedom.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pew.2002.0012

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chan, J.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Joseph
Venue
Philosophy East and West
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2002-07
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
281-310
ISSN
  • 0031-8221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-1898
OpenAlex
W2092395129
Cited by
110
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
23.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy East and West (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
moral autonomy, civil liberties, Confucianism, Confucian ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review