Cited by 37Library Science and Information LiteracyHigher Education Research StudiesLibrary Science and Information

The Academic Library and Student Retention and Graduation: An Exploratory Study

Crawford, Gregory A.·2015·portal: Libraries and the Academy

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationships between variables of institutional expenses, library expenses, and library use and variables representing graduation and retention rates for colleges and universities. Using data drawn from the Integrated Postsecondary Educational Data System and the Academic Library Survey, institutions were compared by their Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education and by control (private or public). ANOVA (analysis of variance) results, indicating the degree of difference or similarity between the groups of data, show that the colleges and universities vary significantly in expenses per student and in use of the library per student. Correlations showed that library expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) and instruction expenses per FTE had the highest overall relationship with graduation and retention rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pla.2015.0003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, G. A.
Corresponding author
Crawford, Gregory A.
Venue
portal: Libraries and the Academy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2015-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
41-57
ISSN
1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047699495
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
43.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
academic libraries, student retention, graduation rates, library expenditures, library use, Carnegie classification, public and private institutions, higher education funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review