Cited by 30Educational Environments and Student OutcomesLibrary Science and Information LiteracyLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Putting Learning into Library Planning

Bennett, Scott·2015·portal: Libraries and the Academy

Abstract

This essay notes the emergence of learning as a key factor in academic library planning. It argues for an improved, learning-oriented planning process by noting the dangers that arise from the priority usually given to fixing dysfunctional space and from the traps of mistaking the things of learning for learning itself and of thinking with the metaphors of learning rather than about what our metaphors actually mean. We can spring the trap by grounding planning in a sound concept of learning and by giving thoughtful attention to questions of ownership and presence in learning spaces. Five habits of highly effective planning are offered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pla.2015.0014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, S.
Corresponding author
Bennett, Scott
Venue
portal: Libraries and the Academy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2015-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
215-231
ISSN
1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041553655
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
16.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords
learning spaces, library space design, planning process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review