The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutrality and Its Discontents: An Essay on the Ethics of Librarianship
Abstract
This essay analyzes the debate about neutrality in the library literature and identifies a fundamental moral dilemma that generates debate. It then advances an argument in favor of library neutrality based on Wayne Bivens-Tatum's intellectual history of library values in Libraries and the Enlightenment and the ideal of liberal neutrality developed by such political philosophers as Ronald Dworkin, John Rawls, and Martha Nussbaum. In conclusion, the essay responds to potential objections to its pro-neutrality thesis by liberal and radical authors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
Noble, S. U. (2020) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 · Cited by 2,709
Cited by
Neutrality in Library and Information Ethics: A Debate in Alternative Foundations
Oltmann, S., Knox, E., McMenemy, D., & Hamilton, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.869 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenzler, J.
- Corresponding author
- Wenzler, John
- ORCID
- Wenzler, John
- Venue
- portal: Libraries and the Academy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-78
- ISSN
- 1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912255213
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- neutrality, library neutrality, ethical dilemmas, Enlightenment, liberal neutrality, Ronald Dworkin, John Rawls, Martha Nussbaum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
