Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Library Science and Information LiteracyWeb and Library ServicesLibrary Science and Administration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Embedded Librarians and Scaffolding for Remote Learning

Open access
Miyaoka, Mayumi, Toolsidass, Rebecca, Magee, Michael·2023·portal: Libraries and the Academy
DOI 10.1353/pla.2023.0010
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the librarians at the Brooklyn Campus of St. Joseph's College New York developed a new embedded librarianship model of instruction, incorporating scaffolded information literacy modules that could be delivered remotely.To measure the new model's efficacy, the researchers administered the 15-item First Year Experience (FYE) Library Literacy Scale to 118 students at the start of the semester as a pretest and again at the end of the semester as a posttest.Results indicated a significant improvement from pretest to posttest, as supported by a significant paired sample t-test, t(117) = -9.01,p < .001.Additional analysis revealed that this result was not influenced by course modality, gender of the student, or which librarian taught the class.The benefits of an embedded librarianship model compared to the traditional one-shot session are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pla.2023.0010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Angela Sample, "Historical Development of Definitions of Information Literacy: A Literature Review of Selected Resources," Journal of Academic Librarianship 46, 2 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102116. · DOI
  2. Meagan Lacy and Hsin-liang Chen, "Rethinking Library Instruction: Using Learning- Outcome Based Design to Teach Online Search Strategies," Journal of Information Literacy 7, 2 (2013): 130-31, https://doi.org/10.11645/7.2.1778. · DOI
  3. Melissa Gross, Don Latham, and Heidi Julien, "What the Framework Means to Me: Attitudes of Academic Librarians toward the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education," Library & Information Science Research 40, 3-4 (2018): 26268, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.09.008; · DOI
  4. Ma Lei Hsieh, Patricia H. Dawson, and Sharon Q. Yang, "The ACRL Framework Successes and Challenges since 2016: A Survey," Journal of Academic Librarianship 47, 2 (2021): 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102306; · DOI
  5. Heidi Julien, Melissa Gross, and Don Latham, "Survey of Information Literacy Instructional Practices in U.S. Academic Libraries," College & Research Libraries 79, 2 (2018), https://crl.acrl.org/ index.php/crl/article/view/16606/18601;
  6. Don Latham, Melissa Gross, and Heidi Julien, "Implementing the ACRL Framework: Reflections from the Field," College & Research Libraries 80, 3 (2019), https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/17397/19517.
  7. Dani Brecher Cook and Kevin Michael Klipfel, "How Do Our Students Learn? An Outline of a Cognitive Psychological Model for Information Literacy Instruction," Reference & User Services Quarterly 55, 1 (2015): 36, https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n1.34. · DOI
  8. Amy Van Epps and Megan Sapp Nelson, "One-Shot or Embedded? Assessing Different Delivery Timing for Information Resources Relevant to Assignments," Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 8, 1 (2013): 5, https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/ index.php/EBLIP/article/view/18027/.
  9. Hsieh, Dawson, and Yang, "The ACRL Framework Successes and Challenges since 2016," 5; Dominique Turnbow and Annie Zeidman-Karpinski, "Don't Use a Hammer when You Need a Screwdriver: How to Use the Right Tools to Create Assessment That Matters," Communications in Information Literacy 10, 2 (2016): 145, https://doi.org/10.15760/ comminfolit.2016.10.2.30. · DOI
  10. Char Booth, M. Sara Lowe, Natalie Tagge, and Sean M. Stone, "Degrees of Impact: Analyzing the Effects of Progressive Librarian Course Collaborations on Student Performance," College & Research Libraries 76, 5 (2015), https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.5.623; · DOI
  11. Margaret G. Burke, "Academic Libraries and the Credit-Bearing Class: A Practical Approach," Communications in Information Literacy 5, 2 (2011), https://doi.org/10.15760/ comminfolit.2012.5.2.110; · DOI
  12. Joanna M. Burkhardt, "Assessing Library Skills: A First Step to Information Literacy," portal: Libraries and the Academy 7, 1 (2007): 25-49, https://doi. org/10.1353/pla.2007.0002. · DOI
  13. Barbara I. Dewey, "The Embedded Librarian: Strategic Campus Collaborations," Resource Sharing & Information Networks 17, 1-2 (2004): 5-17, https://doi.org/10.1300/ J121v17n01_02; · DOI
  14. David Shumaker, "Who Let the Librarians Out? Embedded Librarianship and the Library Manager," Reference & User Services Quarterly 48, 3 (2009): 239-42, https:// www.jstor.org/stable/20865079.
  15. Rachel Wishkoski, Kacy Lundstrom, and Erin Davis, "Faculty Teaching and Librarian- Facilitated Assignment Design," portal: Libraries and the Academy 19, 1 (2019): 95-126, https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2019.0006. · DOI
  16. Kelly O. Secovnie and Lane Glisson, "Scaffolding a Librarian into Your Course: An Assessment of a Research-Based Model for Online Instruction," Teaching English in the Two- Year College 47, 2 (2019): 119-48, https://ncte.org/blog/2020/05/scaffolding-a-librarian- into-your-course/.
  17. Paula Booke and Todd J. Wiebe, "Improving Student Assessments of Elections: The Use of Information Literacy and a Course-Embedded Librarian," Learning and Teaching 10, 2 (2017): 83-106, https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2017.100207; · DOI
  18. Karen Bordonaro and Gillian Richardson, "Scaffolding and Reflection in Course-Integrated Library Instruction," Journal of Academic Librarianship 30, 5 (2004): 395, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.004; · DOI
  19. Nadine Hoffman, Susan Beatty, Patrick Feng, and Jennifer Lee, "Teaching Research Skills through Embedded Librarianship," Reference Services Review 45, 2 (2017), 211-26, http:// doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2016-0045; · DOI
  20. James E. Murphy, Laura Koltutsky, Bartlomiej Lenart, Caitlin McClurg, and Marc Stoeckle, "Academic Librarian Collaborations in Inquiry Based Learning: A Case Study, Reflections and Strategies," Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 15, 2 (2020): 1-21, https://doi.org/10.21083/ partnership.v15i2.5732. · DOI
  21. Jennifer Saulnier, Corey M. Johnson, and Kathleen Whalen, "Scaffolded Research Assignment Analysis for a Required First Year Course," Journal of Academic Librarianship 47, 1 (2021): 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102293. · DOI
  22. Andrea Baer, "Gently Stretching to Reach All Students: Inclusive Learning through Scaffolding and Flexible Pedagogy," College & Research Libraries News 82, 4 (2021): 182, https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.82.4.182. · DOI
  23. Megan J. Oakleaf, The Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries [ACRL], 2010), 21, https://www. ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/value/val_report.pdf.
  24. Devin Savage, Pattie Piotrowski, and Lisa Massengale, "Academic Librarians Engage with Assessment Methods and Tools," portal: Libraries and the Academy 17, 2 (2017): 414, https:// doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0025. · DOI
  25. Beth Tumbleson, John Burke, and Jessica Long, "Assessment, Analytics, and Analysis: Demonstrating the Impact of LMS Embedded Librarians on Student Learning," Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 13, 1-2 (2019): 196-214, https://doi.org/1 0.1080/1533290X.2018.1499252. · DOI
  26. Dante D. Dixson and Frank C. Worrell, "Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom," Theory into Practice 55, 2 (2016): 154-55, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.201 6.1148989. · DOI
  27. Natalie Haber and Tiffany N. Mitchell, "Using Formative & Summative Assessment to Evaluate Library Instruction in an Online First Year Writing Course," Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 11, 3-4 (2017): 300313, https://doi.org/10.1080/153 3290X.2017.1324549; · DOI
  28. Michelle Kathleen Dunaway and Michael Teague Orblych, "Formative Assessment: Transforming Information Literacy Instruction," Reference Services Review 39, 1 (2011): 2441, https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111108097; · DOI
  29. Bonnie J. M. Swoger, "Closing the Assessment Loop Using Pre-and Post-Assessment," Reference Services Review 39, 2 (2011):24459, https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111135475. · DOI
  30. Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, Allison Rand, and Jillian Collier, "Predictable Information Literacy Misconceptions of First-Year College Students," Communications in Information Literacy 12, 1 (2018): 14, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183245.pdf.
  31. Mfundo Mandla Masuku, Nokukhanya Noqiniselo Jili, and Primrose Thandekile Sabela, "Assessment as a Pedagogy and Measuring Tool in Promoting Deep Learning in Institutions of Higher Learning," International Journal of Higher Education 10, 2 (2020): 279, https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p274. · DOI
  32. David Schwieder and Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, "A Multilevel Approach for Library Value Assessment," College & Research Libraries 79, 3 (2018): 430, https://doi.org/10.5860/ crl.79.3.424. · DOI
  33. Jacalyn E. Bryan and Elana Karshmer, "Assessment in the One-Shot Session: Using Pre- and Post-Tests to Measure Innovative Instructional Strategies among First-Year Students," College & Research Libraries 74, 6 (2013): 578, https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/ view/16339/17785.
  34. Kathia Ibacache, Amanda Rybin Koob, and Eric Vance, "Emergency Remote Library Instruction and Tech Tools," Information Technology and Libraries 40, 2 (2021): 5-7, https:// doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12751. · DOI
  35. Elizabeth Humrickhouse, "Flipped Classroom Pedagogy in an Online Learning Environment: A Self-Regulated Introduction to Information Literacy Threshold Concepts," Journal of Academic Librarianship 47, 2 (2021): 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. acalib.2021.102327. · DOI
  36. Ann Grafstein, "A Discipline-Based Approach to Information Literacy," Journal of Academic Librarianship 28, 4 (2002): 201-2, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00283-5. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Miyaoka, M., Toolsidass, R., & Magee, M.
ORCID
Toolsidass, Rebecca
Venue
portal: Libraries and the Academy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2023-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
169-195
ISSN
1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1353/pla.2023.0010
OpenAlex
W4316259448
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
Keywords
embedded librarianship, information literacy instruction, scaffolding, distance education, COVID-19 pandemic, one-shot instruction, first-year students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review