The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Globalization of Nothing
Open accessAbstract
Globalization is not a singular process with uniform results, but a term that encompasses a number of transnational processes. This essay distinguishes between two broad sub-processes under the larger heading of globalization—glocalization (the integration of the global and the local) and grobalization (the imposition of the global on the local). It also explores the distinction between nothing (forms that are centrally conceived and controlled and largely lacking in distinctive content) and something (forms that are indigenously conceived and controlled and comparatively rich in distinctive content). The article focuses on two pairings that result from relating these sets of concepts—the grobalization of nothing and the glocalization of something. In the realm of culture in general and consumption in particular, the conflict between these two processes is a central issue in the world today. The triumph of the grobalization of nothing promises cultural homogeneity, while the glocalization of something offers at least some hope for cultural heterogeneity in a world in which the truly local has almost entirely disappeared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Globalization, or the logic of cultural hybridization: the case of the Korean wave
Ryoo, W. (2009) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292980902826427 · Cited by 203
Legitimation of hybrid cultural products: The case of American Yoga
Coskuner-Balli, G., & Ertimur, B. (2017) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593116659786 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritzer, G.
- Venue
- SAIS Review
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-200
- ISSN
- 0732-913X (ISSN-L)
- 1088-3142
- OpenAlex
- W2119875501
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Globalization of Nothing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/sais.2003.0053
- The paper
- Ritzer, G. (2003). The Globalization of Nothing. SAIS Review. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2003.0053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.