Cited by 1,051Social Movements and Cultural IdentityElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationRace, History, and American Society

Conceptualizing Political Opportunity

Meyer, D. S., Minkoff, D. C.·2004·Social Forces

Abstract

This article reviews central problems in political opportunity theory and explores the implications of adopting certain conceptualizations of political opportunities for explaining the emergence, development, and influence of protest movements. Results from multivariate analyses of civil rights protest, organizational formation, and policy outcomes indicate significant variation depending on (1) whether the political opportunity structure is conceptualized broadly or narrowly, (2) the dependent variable concerned, and (3) the underlying assumptions about the mechanisms through which opportunities translate into action. We argue that the variation in results can best be understood by adopting a broader understanding of protest and the political process and that theory development requires more careful and more explicit — although not necessarily more uniform — conceptualization and specification of political opportunity variables and models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/sof.2004.0082

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gruppen wägen in ihren Handlungsentscheidungen mögliche Optionen auf Basis ihrer gruppenspezifischen Kapazitäten und der strukturellen Umgebung rationalistisch ab, wobei der strukturellen Umgebung ein bedeutender Stellenwert beigemessen wird.

    “In ihren Handlungsentscheidungen wägen Gruppen also mögliche Optionen auf Basis ihrer gruppenspezifischen Kapazitäten und der strukturellen Umgebung in rationalistischer Natur ab, wobei letzteren ein bedeutender Stellenwert beigemessen wird.”

    From Taxation Without Representation (2010) · cites this paper as Meyer & Minkoff 2004

  • Die politikwissenschaftlichen Erklärungsansätze bauen auf neoinstitutionellen Modellen aus dem Forschungsfeld der sozialen Bewegungen auf, nämlich politischen Opportunitätsstrukturen.

    “Die dabei angewandten politikwissenschaftlichen Erklärungsansätze bauen auf neoinstitutionellen Modellen aus dem Forschungsfeld der sozialen Bewegungen auf, nämlich politischen Opportunitätsstrukturen.”

    From Taxation Without Representation (2010) · cites this paper as Meyer & Minkoff 2004:1457f

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, D. S., & Minkoff, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Meyer, D. S.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
1457-1492
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2140991242
Cited by
1,051
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 46
FWCI
59.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Forces (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
political opportunity structure, protest movements, civil rights protest, organizational formation, policy outcomes, political process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review