Upward Wealth Mobility: Exploring the Roman Catholic Advantage
Abstract
Wealth inequality is among the most extreme forms of stratification in the United States, and upward wealth mobility is not common. Yet mobility is possible, and this paper takes advantage of trends among a unique group to explore the processes that generate mobility. I show that non-Hispanic whites raised in Roman Catholic families have been upwardly mobile in the wealth distribution in recent decades, and I find that unique fertility, marriage and education patterns contributed to this change. I also show that Catholic values related to work and money contributed to relatively high saving and portfolio behavior that facilitated mobility. The results provide important insight into the process by which childhood experiences shape adult well-being, particularly adult wealth ownership. The findings also contribute to understanding of social inequality by identifying important behaviors and processes that facilitate mobility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Religious upbringing is associated with wealth; Jews accumulate more than otherwise similar mainline Protestants and Catholics, who accumulate more than conservative Protestants.
“Religious upbringing is also associated with wealth, with Jews accumulating more wealth than otherwise similar mainline Protestants and Catholics, who in turn accumulate more than conservative Protestants (Keister 2003b, 2007, 2008).”
From Wealth Inequality and Accumulation (2017) · cites this paper as Keister 2007
Cites
Religious Influence on Marital Stability
Call, V. R. A., & Heaton, T. B. (1997) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1387856 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wealth Inequality and Accumulation
Killewald, A., Pfeffer, F. T., & Schachner, J. N. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053331 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
- Authors
- Keister, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keister, L. A.
- ORCID
- Keister, L. A.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1195-1225
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2121457696
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Forces (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Keywords
- wealth inequality, non-Hispanic whites, fertility patterns, marriage patterns, educational attainment, saving behavior, portfolio behavior, Catholic values, work ethic, childhood experiences, social stratification, wealth ownership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review