Cited by 101Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesIncome, Poverty, and InequalitySocial and Cultural Dynamics

Upward Wealth Mobility: Exploring the Roman Catholic Advantage

Keister, L. A.·2007·Social Forces

Abstract

Wealth inequality is among the most extreme forms of stratification in the United States, and upward wealth mobility is not common. Yet mobility is possible, and this paper takes advantage of trends among a unique group to explore the processes that generate mobility. I show that non-Hispanic whites raised in Roman Catholic families have been upwardly mobile in the wealth distribution in recent decades, and I find that unique fertility, marriage and education patterns contributed to this change. I also show that Catholic values related to work and money contributed to relatively high saving and portfolio behavior that facilitated mobility. The results provide important insight into the process by which childhood experiences shape adult well-being, particularly adult wealth ownership. The findings also contribute to understanding of social inequality by identifying important behaviors and processes that facilitate mobility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/sof.2007.0044

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Religious upbringing is associated with wealth; Jews accumulate more than otherwise similar mainline Protestants and Catholics, who accumulate more than conservative Protestants.

    “Religious upbringing is also associated with wealth, with Jews accumulating more wealth than otherwise similar mainline Protestants and Catholics, who in turn accumulate more than conservative Protestants (Keister 2003b, 2007, 2008).”

    From Wealth Inequality and Accumulation (2017) · cites this paper as Keister 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keister, L. A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Keister, L. A.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
1195-1225
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2121457696
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Forces (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
wealth inequality, non-Hispanic whites, fertility patterns, marriage patterns, educational attainment, saving behavior, portfolio behavior, Catholic values, work ethic, childhood experiences, social stratification, wealth ownership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review