Cited by 56Political Economy and MarxismBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCybernetics and Technology in Society

Bitcoin and Potosí Silver: Historical Perspectives on Cryptocurrency

Open access
Zimmer, Zac·2017·Technology and Culture

Abstract

Bitcoin, the digital cryptocurrency, has been celebrated as the future of money on the Internet. Although Bitcoin does present several forward-looking innovations, it also integrates a very old concept into its digital architecture: the mining of precious metals. Even though Bitcoin explicitly invokes mining as a metaphor and gold as an example for understanding the cryptocurrency, there has been little critical work on the connections between Bitcoin and previous metalist currency regimes. The following essay proposes a historical comparison with colonial South American silver mining and the global currency regime based on the New World silver peso it created as a way to interrogate Bitcoin. The comparison with colonial South America, and specifically the silver mining economy around the Cerro Rico de Potosí, will help to develop a historical and political understanding of Bitcoin's stakes, including questions of resources, labor, energy, and ecology. Mining and the extractive apparatus that accompanies it always imply massive-scale earthworks that reshape the planet itself, a process known as terraforming. The Potosí comparison will reveal Bitcoin to form part of a similar process of digital primitive accumulation we can provisionally name cryptoforming.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/tech.2017.0038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bitcoin mining is reproducing the general pattern of mining towards centralisation, as witnessed in the recent consolidation of bitcoin mining.

    “In the process Zimmer shows how, despite all the talk of decentralization, bitcoin is reproducing the pattern of mining in general, which is towards centralisation, as witnessed in the bitcoin mining consolidation of the recent past.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 56

Authors
Zimmer, Z.
Corresponding author
Zimmer, Zac
Venue
Technology and Culture
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2017
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
307-334
ISSN
  • 0040-165X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-3729
OpenAlex
W2644504898
Cited by
56
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
FWCI
14.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technology and Culture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
Bitcoin, cryptocurrency, colonial South America, terraforming, extractivism, mining operations, monetary history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review