Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 157Historical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisCybernetics and Technology in SocietyPhilosophy, History, and Historiography

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Technology and History: “Kranzberg’s Laws”

Kranzberg, Melvin·1986·Technology and Culture
DOI 10.1353/tech.2021.0008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/tech.2021.0008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Items 101–157 of 157

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kranzberg, M.
Corresponding author
Kranzberg, Melvin
Venue
Technology and Culture
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
1986-07
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
544-560
ISSN
  • 0040-165X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-3729
DOI
10.1353/tech.2021.0008
OpenAlex
W3135089173
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology and Culture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Keywords
technology and society, history of technology, technology and economy, technology and politics
MeSH terms
Technology, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.