The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural Sovereignty and Native American Hermeneutics in the Interpretation of the Sacred Stories of the Anishinaabe
Abstract
Sovereignty is an issue that works on many different levels. On the one hand, issues of land and politics must figure greatly into any discussion of self-determination. On the other hand, issues of cultural sovereignty must be taken into account as well. In a scenario in which Native Americans achieved sovereignty over their land and politics, would that accomplishment have any functional meaning if, at the same time, Native Americans were fully assimilated into the culture of the dominant society? The importance of cultural sovereignty can thus be accepted as a given.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They tend to embrace both “communitism” (the search for and commitment to Indigenous community and values; Weaver, 1997) and respectful individualism and cultural sovereignty (where individual and cultural differences are upheld and maintained rather than homogenized; Gross, 2003).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Gross, 2003
Citations
Cited by
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652
“They tend to embrace both “communitism” (the search for and commitment to Indigenous community and values; Weaver, 1997) and respectful individualism and cultural sovereignty (where individual and cultural differences are upheld and maintained rather than homogenized; Gross, 2003).”
BackgroundEigenbrod, R. (2012) · ESC: English Studies in Canada · doi:10.1353/esc.2013.0006 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, L. W.
- Corresponding author
- Gross, Lawrence William
- Venue
- Wicazo Sa Review
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-134
- ISSN
- 0749-6427 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7901
- OpenAlex
- W2062166942
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wicazo Sa Review (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- cultural sovereignty, Anishinaabe, religious narratives, Indigenous self-determination, assimilation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
