CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Appalachian Local HistoryHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeological Research and Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Did the Miners See?: Archaeology, Deep Mapping, and the Battle of Blair Mountain

Nida, Brandon, Harris, Trevor, Williams, A. Rochelle, Martin, Lou·2018·West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies
DOI 10.1353/wvh.2018.0007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies - New Series, Volume 12, Numbers 1 and 2, Spring and Fall 2018

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/wvh.2018.0007

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nida, B., Harris, T., Williams, A. R., & Martin, L.
Venue
West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2018
Volume
12
Issue
1-2
Pages
97-120
ISSN
  • 0043-325X (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-5057
DOI
10.1353/wvh.2018.0007
OpenAlex
W2894643881
Cited by
0
References
26
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • West Virginia history (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Appalachian Local History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
Keywords
deep mapping, miners, coal mining, labor history, visual representation of history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review