The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparative Review of Melanocytic Neoplasms
Abstract
Melanoma is a devastating disease frequently encountered within both veterinary and human medicine. Molecular changes linked with neoplastic transformation of melanocytes include mutations in genes that encode proteins intrinsic to the regulatory pathways of two tumor suppressor proteins (retinoblastoma protein and p53), proto-oncogene mutation to oncogenes, altered expression of epithelial cadherin and CD44 adhesion molecules, and upregulation of angiogenic factors and other growth factors. Histologic evaluation of the primary mass is the most common means of diagnosis, with cytology used more frequently to document metastasis. Melanoma's highly variable histologic and cytologic patterns can make diagnosis by either method problematic. Adherent epithelioid morphology, including signet ring forms, and nonadherent round and spindle forms are recognized, with pigmentation an inconsistent finding. The site of the tumor, the thickness of the primary tumor or depth of invasion, and the number of mitotic figures per high-power field or per millimeter are used histologically to predict biologic behavior, whereas site and degree of pleomorphism are typically used for cytologic preparations. Diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma can be aided by ancillary diagnostic techniques. Tumor cells are usually positive for vimentin, S100, neuron-specific enolase, and Melan-A, and negative for cytokeratin. Melan-A as a positive marker is not as sensitive as the others are but is likely more specific. Monoclonal antibodies to human melanosome-specific antigens 1 and 5 cross-react with canine antigens for a combined sensitivity rate of 83%. Mouse monoclonal antibody IBF9 specifically recognizes canine melanoma antigen and also has good sensitivity. Serologic markers, including cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, and melanoma-inhibitory activity, are being investigated as potential sentinels of melanoma. Currently, there is no single diagnostic technique capable of differentiating benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms or predicting survival time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Final Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma
Balch, C. M., Buzaid, A. C., Soong, S.-J., Atkins, M. B., Cascinelli, N., Coit, D. G., Fleming, I. D., Gershenwald, J. E., Houghton, A., Kirkwood, J. M., et al. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.16.3635 · Cited by 2,636
Thickness, Cross-Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma
Breslow, A. (1970) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-197011000-00017 · Cited by 2,426
Model Predicting Survival in Stage I Melanoma Based on Tumor Progression
Clark, W. H., Elder, D. E., Guerry, D., Braitman, L. E., Trock, B. J., Schultz, D., Synnestvedt, M., & Halpern, A. C. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1893 · Cited by 1,247
Goodison, S., Urquidi, V, & Tarin, D. (1999) · Molecular Pathology · doi:10.1136/mp.52.4.189 · Cited by 679
Malaparte, C. (1988) · Cited by 601
Monoclonal antibodies specific for melanocytic tumors distinguish subpopulations of melanocytes.
Gown, A. M., VOGEL, A. M., Hoak, D., Gough, F., & McNutt, M. A. (1986) · PubMed Central · Cited by 536
Selected Histochemical and Histopathological Methods
Melnick, P. J. (1966) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/46.3.384a · Cited by 534
AUTOCRINE AND PARACRINE REGULATION BY CYTOKINES AND GROWTH FACTORS IN MELANOMA
Lázár-Molnár, E., Hegyesi, H., Tóth, S., & Falus, A. (2000) · Cytokine · doi:10.1006/cyto.1999.0614 · Cited by 416
Koh, H. K. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107183250306 · Cited by 403
Ugurel, S., Rappl, G., Tilgen, W., & Reinhold, U. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.577 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Animal models and therapeutic molecular targets of cancer: utility and limitations
Cekanova, M., & Rathore, K. (2014) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s49584 · Cited by 274
Gardner, H. L., Fenger, J. M., & London, C. A. (2016) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110911 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, S. H., Goldschmidt, M. H., & McManus, P. M.
- Venue
- Veterinary Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 651-678
- ISSN
- 0300-9858 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-2217
- OpenAlex
- W2141456229
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Review of Melanocytic Neoplasms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1354/vp.39-6-651
- The paper
- Smith, S. H., Goldschmidt, M. H., & McManus, P. M. (2002). A Comparative Review of Melanocytic Neoplasms. Veterinary Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1354/vp.39-6-651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.