The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic Wasting Disease
Abstract
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a unique transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus), white-tailed deer ( O. virginianus), and Rocky Mountain elk ( Cervus elaphus nelsoni). The natural history of CWD is incompletely understood, but it differs from scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) by virtue of its occurrence in nondomestic and free-ranging species. CWD has many features in common with scrapie, including early widespread distribution of disease-associated prion protein (PrP d) in lymphoid tissues, with later involvement of central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral tissues. This distribution likely contributes to apparent efficiency of horizontal transmission and, in this, is similar to scrapie and differs from BSE. Clinical features and lesions of CWD are qualitatively similar to the other animal TSEs. Microscopically, marked spongiform lesions occur in the central nervous system (CNS) after a prolonged incubation period and variable course of clinical disease. During incubation, PrP d can be identified in tissues by antibody-based detection systems. Although CWD can be transmitted by intracerebral inoculation to cattle, sheep, and goats, ongoing studies have not demonstrated that domestic livestock are susceptible via oral exposure, the presumed natural route of exposure to TSEs. Surveillance efforts for CWD in captive and free-ranging cervids will continue in concert with similar activities for scrapie and BSE. Eradication of CWD in farmed cervids is the goal of state, federal, and industry programs, but eradication of CWD from free-ranging populations of cervids is unlikely with currently available management techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of 'new variant' CJD
Collinge, J., Sidle, K. C. L., Meads, J., Ironside, J., & Hill, A. F. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383685a0 · Cited by 1,735
Cited by
Neurodegenerative Diseases: Expanding the Prion Concept
Walker, L. C., & Jucker, M. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033828 · Cited by 361
Molecular Mechanisms of Prion Pathogenesis
Aguzzi, A., Sigurdson, C., & Heikenwaelder, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154326 · Cited by 351
Asymptomatic deer excrete infectious prions in faeces
Tamgüney, G., Miller, M. W., Wolfe, L. L., Sirochman, T. M., Glidden, D. V., Palmer, C., Lemus, A., DeArmond, S. J., & Prusiner, S. B. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08289 · Cited by 272
Transport of prions in the peripheral nervous system: pathways, cell types, and mechanisms
Koshy, S. M., Kincaid, A. E., & Bartz, J. C. (2022) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v14030630 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, E. S.
- Venue
- Veterinary Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 530-549
- ISSN
- 0300-9858 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-2217
- OpenAlex
- W2142002352
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Wasting Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1354/vp.42-5-530
- The paper
- Williams, E. S. (2005). Chronic Wasting Disease. Veterinary Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1354/vp.42-5-530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.