Cited by 5Peacebuilding and International SecurityPolitical Conflict and GovernanceMilitary History and Strategy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The GRP-MILF Peace Talks: Quo Vadis?

Open access
Rizal G. Buendia·2004·Southeast Asian Affairs 2004

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1355/9789812306944-016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buendia, R. G.
Corresponding author
Rizal G. Buendia
Venue
Southeast Asian Affairs 2004
Published
2004-12-31
Pages
205-222
OpenAlex
W4213200659
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • ISEAS Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
Keywords
peace negotiations, Moro conflict, Moro National Liberation Front, peace process, armed conflict resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review