Cited by 365Bone health and osteoporosis researchSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesScoliosis diagnosis and treatment

What Proportion of Incident Radiographic Vertebral Deformities Is Clinically Diagnosed and Vice Versa?

Fink, Howard A, Milavetz, Donna L, Palermo, Lisa, Nevitt, Michael C, Cauley, Jane A, Genant, Harry K, Black, Dennis M, Ensrud, Kristine E·2005·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

We prospectively examined, in a large cohort of older women, the proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities diagnosed as incident clinical vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level. The proportion of deformities clinically diagnosed ranged from <15% for milder deformities to nearly 30% for more severe deformities. Introduction: The relationship between radiographic and clinical vertebral fractures is incompletely understood. No previous study has prospectively compared the agreement between incident radiographic vertebral deformities and incident community-recognized, radiographically confirmed vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level(s). Materials and Methods: This analysis of data from the Fracture Intervention Trial included all participants who completed both baseline and at least one scheduled follow-up lateral spinal radiograph (n = 6084). Incident vertebral deformities were defined at a given vertebral level as a reduction between baseline and closeout radiographs of ≥20% and 4 mm in any vertebral height and subdivided into two severity categories. Incident clinical vertebral fractures were those reported to clinical centers by participants and confirmed by the study radiologist, who compared the community spinal radiograph with the participant's baseline study radiograph using semiquantitative methods. Results: A total of 446 incident radiographic vertebral deformities were identified in 330 women, whereas 121 women experienced one or more confirmed incident clinical vertebral fracture. Of incident radiograpic vertebral deformities, 22.6% were also clinically diagnosed as incident vertebral fractures, with clinical diagnoses made for 28.4% of the deformities that exceeded 30% and 4 mm height loss (severe deformity) compared with 14.3% for deformities that involved ≥20% and 4 mm but <30% height loss (milder deformity). Of incident clinical vertebral fractures, 72.7% were morphometrically identified as incident deformities, most of them as severe deformities. More than 20% of incident clinical fractures were not identified as incident deformities by even the most liberal morphometric criterion used in this study. Conclusions: Approximately one-fourth of incident radiographic vertebral deformities were clinically diagnosed as new vertebral fractures, although the proportion clinically diagnosed was increased for more severe deformities. Whereas most incident clinical vertebral fractures were identified as severe morphometric deformities, approximately one-fourth did not meet even the most liberal study criterion for morphometric deformity. Further study of factors that may explain the discordance between incident vertebral deformities and incident clinical vertebral fractures is important.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.050314

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fink, H. A., Milavetz, D. L., Palermo, L., Nevitt, M. C., Cauley, J. A., Genant, H. K., Black, D. M., & Ensrud, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Fink, Howard A
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
1216-1222
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W1993913510
Cited by
365
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
vertebral deformity, vertebral fractures, older women, Fracture Intervention Trial, osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment tools, osteopenia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, vertebral compression fractures
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Fractures, Spontaneous, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Radiography, Incidence, Spinal Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review