What Proportion of Incident Radiographic Vertebral Deformities Is Clinically Diagnosed and Vice Versa?
Abstract
We prospectively examined, in a large cohort of older women, the proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities diagnosed as incident clinical vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level. The proportion of deformities clinically diagnosed ranged from <15% for milder deformities to nearly 30% for more severe deformities. Introduction: The relationship between radiographic and clinical vertebral fractures is incompletely understood. No previous study has prospectively compared the agreement between incident radiographic vertebral deformities and incident community-recognized, radiographically confirmed vertebral fractures in the same women at the same vertebral level(s). Materials and Methods: This analysis of data from the Fracture Intervention Trial included all participants who completed both baseline and at least one scheduled follow-up lateral spinal radiograph (n = 6084). Incident vertebral deformities were defined at a given vertebral level as a reduction between baseline and closeout radiographs of ≥20% and 4 mm in any vertebral height and subdivided into two severity categories. Incident clinical vertebral fractures were those reported to clinical centers by participants and confirmed by the study radiologist, who compared the community spinal radiograph with the participant's baseline study radiograph using semiquantitative methods. Results: A total of 446 incident radiographic vertebral deformities were identified in 330 women, whereas 121 women experienced one or more confirmed incident clinical vertebral fracture. Of incident radiograpic vertebral deformities, 22.6% were also clinically diagnosed as incident vertebral fractures, with clinical diagnoses made for 28.4% of the deformities that exceeded 30% and 4 mm height loss (severe deformity) compared with 14.3% for deformities that involved ≥20% and 4 mm but <30% height loss (milder deformity). Of incident clinical vertebral fractures, 72.7% were morphometrically identified as incident deformities, most of them as severe deformities. More than 20% of incident clinical fractures were not identified as incident deformities by even the most liberal morphometric criterion used in this study. Conclusions: Approximately one-fourth of incident radiographic vertebral deformities were clinically diagnosed as new vertebral fractures, although the proportion clinically diagnosed was increased for more severe deformities. Whereas most incident clinical vertebral fractures were identified as severe morphometric deformities, approximately one-fourth did not meet even the most liberal study criterion for morphometric deformity. Further study of factors that may explain the discordance between incident vertebral deformities and incident clinical vertebral fractures is important.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures remain clinically silent with only 15-30% coming to clinical attention.
“Moreover, osteoporotic vertebral fractures remain clinically silent with only 15–30% coming to clinical attention [11].”
From Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Epstein, R. S., & Wasnich, R. D. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-919 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Gregson, C. L., Armstrong, D. J., Bowden, J., Cooper, C., Edwards, J., Gittoes, N. J. L., Harvey, N., Kanis, J., Leyland, S., Low, R., et al. (2022) · Archives of Osteoporosis · doi:10.1007/s11657-022-01061-5 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age
Ensrud, K. E. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glt092 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Self-citationSubclinical Thyroid Dysfunction and Fracture Risk: A Meta-analysis
Blum, M. R., Bauer, D. C., Collet, T.-H., Fink, H. A., Cappola, A. R., da Costa, B. R., Wirth, C. D., Peeters, R. P., Åsvold, B. O., den Elzen, W. P. J., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.5161 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Self-citationLöffler, M. T., Jacob, A., Scharr, A., Sollmann, N., Burian, E., El Husseini, M., Sekuboyina, A., Tetteh, G., Zimmer, C., Gempt, J., et al. (2021) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07655-2 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“Moreover, osteoporotic vertebral fractures remain clinically silent with only 15–30% coming to clinical attention [11].”
BackgroundUncertainties in the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis
Hansen, K. E., Wilson, H. A., Zapalowski, C., Fink, H. A., Minisola, S., & Adler, R. A. (2011) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.362 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fink, H. A., Milavetz, D. L., Palermo, L., Nevitt, M. C., Cauley, J. A., Genant, H. K., Black, D. M., & Ensrud, K. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fink, Howard A
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1216-1222
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1993913510
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH Clinical Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Keywords
- vertebral deformity, vertebral fractures, older women, Fracture Intervention Trial, osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment tools, osteopenia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, vertebral compression fractures
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Fractures, Spontaneous, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Radiography, Incidence, Spinal Fractures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review