Cited by 163Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and treatments

Effects of Salmon Calcitonin on Trabecular Microarchitecture as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results From the QUEST Study

Open access
Chesnut, Charles H, Majumdar, Sharmilla, Newitt, David C, Shields, Andrew, Van Pelt, Jan, Laschansky, Ellen, Azria, Moise, Kriegman, Audrey +3 more·2005·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

The unique noninvasive MRI technique was used to assess trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites in 91 postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo over 2 years. In the distal radius and lower trochanter of the hip, individuals treated with CT-NS exhibited significant preservation of trabecular bone microarchitecture compared with placebo, where significant deterioration was shown. MRI analyses of os calcis or μCT/histomorphometric analyses of bone biopsies did not reveal consistent differences in architecture between CT-NS and placebo. Introduction: It is postulated that the reduction in osteoporotic fracture risk in response to certain antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies is caused less by effects on bone quantity than on bone quality (specifically trabecular microarchitecture). To test this hypothesis, the QUEST study was conducted to assess the effects of nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo on parameters of trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites using noninvasive MRI technology and iliac crest bone biopsies by μCT/histomorphometry. Materials and Methods: Ninety-one postmenopausal osteoporotic women were followed for 2 years (n = 46 for CT-NS, n = 45 for placebo); all women received 500 mg calcium daily. MRI measurements at distal radius, hip (T2 relaxation time {T2}), and os calcis (obtained yearly), iliac crest bone biopsies with 2D histomorphometry and 3D μCT (obtained at study onset and conclusion), DXA-BMD at spine/hip/wrist/os calcis (obtained yearly), and markers of bone turnover (obtained at 2-week to 12-month intervals) were analyzed, with an analysis of covariance model used to assess treatment effect for parameters of interest. Results and Conclusions: MRI assessment of trabecular microarchitecture at individual regions of the distal radius revealed significant improvement, or preservation (no significant loss), in the CT-NS-treated group compared with significant deterioration in the placebo control group, as reflected in apparent BV/TV (p < 0.03), apparent trabecular number (p < 0.01), and apparent trabecular spacing (p < 0.01). Also, at the hip, the CT-NS group exhibited preservation of trabecular microarchitecture at the lower trochanter (p < 0.05) as determined by T2MRI technology. Significant deterioration of trabecular bone architecture was noted in the placebo group at the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and lower trochanteric sites. Apart from a significant increase in apparent trabecular number in the CT-NS group, significant changes within or between groups were not noted at the os calcis. Combined μCT/histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies did not reveal significant differences between treated and placebo groups. In the CT-NS group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, preservation of parameters of trabecular microarchitecture was noted, whereas in the placebo group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, loss or preservation was noted; however, changes in DXA/BMD (of the spine, hip, wrist, os calcis) between CT-NS and placebo groups were not significant. Serum C-telopeptide (S-CTx), a specific bone resorption marker, was reduced by 22.5% at 24 months (p = 0.056). The results of the QUEST study suggest therapeutic benefit of CT-NS compared with placebo in maintaining trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites and support the use of MRI technology for assessment of trabecular microarchitecture in clinical research trials. However, the results also highlight site specific differences in response to antiresorptive therapies and the importance of sufficiently large sampling volumes (areas) to obtain reliable assessment of bone architecture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.050411

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2-year placebo-controlled trial of 91 postmenopausal osteoporotic women suggested intranasal sCT maintained trabecular microarchitecture at some skeletal sites but not others.

    “This 2-yr, placebo-controlled trial of 91 postmenopausal osteoporotic women suggested a therapeutic benefit of sCT in maintaining trabecular microarchitecture at some skeletal sites, but not others.”

    From The Activity of Peptides of the Calcitonin Family in Bone (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 163

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Newitt D, Majumdar S 2000 A Semi-Automated System for Segmenting, Registering, Thresholding, and Analyzing High Resolution MRI of Trabecular Bone. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM 2000, Denver, Colorado.

Authors
Chesnut, C. H., Majumdar, S., Newitt, D. C., Shields, A., Van Pelt, J., Laschansky, E., Azria, M., Kriegman, A., Olson, M., Eriksen, E. F., & Mindeholm, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Osteoporosis Research Group, Department of Radiology (UWMC-ORG), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
Corresponding author
Chesnut, Charles H
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1548-1561
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2019293043
Cited by
163
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017762)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
salmon calcitonin, trabecular bone microarchitecture, postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone quality, bone quantity, distal radius, hip, calcaneus, iliac crest bone biopsy, micro-CT, histomorphometry, bone turnover markers, bone mineral density, osteoporotic fracture risk, T2 relaxation time
MeSH terms
Aged, Analgesics, Animals, Biopsy, Bone and Bones, Bone Resorption, Calcitonin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hip, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Osteoporosis, Placebos, Risk, Salmon, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Models, Statistical, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Treatment Outcome, Fracture Healing, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review