The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Pregnancy on Bone Density and Bone Turnover
Abstract
During pregnancy, the mother adapts to meet the calcium demands of the fetus. The effect of this adaptation on the maternal skeleton is not fully understood. Our objectives were to evaluate changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover during pregnancy. We studied 16 women longitudinally, with baseline measurements before pregnancy; then at 16, 26, and 36 weeks of pregnancy; and postpartum. We measured total-body BMD and biochemical markers of bone resorption (urinary pyridinium crosslinks and telopeptides of type I collagen) and bone formation (serum bone alkaline phosphatase, propeptides of type I procollagen [PINP] and osteocalcin). We also measured parathyroid hormone (PTH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and human placental lactogen. Postpartum, BMD increased in the arms (2.8%, P< 0.01) and legs (1.9%, P< 0.01) but decreased in the pelvis (−3.2%, P<0.05) and spine (−4.6%, P< 0.01) compared with prepregnancy values. All biochemical markers, with the exception of osteocalcin concentration, increased during pregnancy. The change in IGF-I at 36 weeks was related to the change in biochemical markers (e.g., PINP, r = 0.72, P= 0.002). Pregnancy is a high-bone-turnover state. IGF-I levels may be an important determinant of bone turnover during pregnancy. Elevated bone turnover may explain trabecular bone loss during pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maternal Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Post-Weaning Recovery
Kovacs, C. S. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2015 · Cited by 544
The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis
Wheater, G., Elshahaly, M., Tuck, S. P., Datta, H. K., & van Laar, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/1479-5876-11-201 · Cited by 322
Mazziotti, G., Frara, S., & Giustina, A. (2018) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2018-00005 · Cited by 181
Body composition changes in pregnancy: measurement, predictors and outcomes
Widen, E. M., & Gallagher, D. (2014) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.40 · Cited by 165
Bed rest and other determinants of bone loss during pregnancy
Promislow, J. H. E., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Schramm, M., Watt-Morse, M., & Anderson, J. J. B. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.058 · Cited by 57
Effect of bed rest during pregnancy on bone turnover markers in pregnant and postpartum women
Kaji, T., Yasui, T., Suto, M., Mitani, R., Morine, M., Uemura, H., Maeda, K., & Irahara, M. (2007) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.11.018 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Naylor, K. E., Iqbal, P., Fledelius, C., Fraser, R. B., & Eastell, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-137
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1979826291
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.