Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partitioning a Daily Mechanical Stimulus into Discrete Loading Bouts Improves the Osteogenic Response to Loading

Open access
Robling, Alexander G., Burr, David B., Turner, Charles H.·2000·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

A single 3-minute bout of mechanical loading increases bone formation in the rat tibia. We hypothesized that more frequent, shorter loading bouts would elicit a greater osteogenic response than a single 3-minute bout. The right tibias of 36 adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 360 bending cycles per day of a 54N force delivered in 1, 2, 4, or 6 bouts on each of the 3 loading days. Rats in the 6-bouts/day group received 60 bending cycles per bout (60 × 6); rats in the 4-bouts/day group received 90 bending cycles per bout (90 × 4); the 2- and 1-bouts/day groups received 180 and 360 bending cycles per bout, respectively (180 × 2 and 360 × 1). A nonloaded, age-matched control group (0 × 0) and two sham-bending groups (60 × 6 and 360 × 1) also were included. Fluorochrome labeling revealed a 10-fold increase in endocortical lamellar bone formation rate (BFR/bone surface [BS]) in the right tibia versus the left (nonloaded) side in the 60 × 6 bending group. Endocortical BFR/BS in the right tibia of the 4-, 2-, and 1-bout bending groups exhibited 8-, 4-, and 4-fold increases, respectively, over the control side. Relative (right minus left) values for endocortical BFR/BS, mineralizing surface (MS/BS), and mineral apposition rate (MAR) were 65–94% greater in the 90 × 4 and 60 × 6 bending groups compared to the 360 × 1 bending group. Sham-bending tibias exhibited relative endocortical bone formation values similar to those collected from the control (0 × 0) group. The data show that 360 daily loading cycles applied at intervals of 60 × 6 or 90 × 4 represent a more osteogenic stimulus than 360 cycles applied all at once, and that mechanical loading is more osteogenic when divided into discrete loading bouts. Presumably, bone cells become increasingly “deaf” to the mechanical stimulus as loading cycles persist uninterrupted, and by allowing a rest period between loading bouts, the osteogenic effectiveness of subsequent cycles can be increased.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1596

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Robling, A. G., Burr, D. B., & Turner, C. H.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1596-1602
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2007438632
Cited by
244
References
0
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning a Daily Mechanical Stimulus into Discrete Loading Bouts Improves the Osteogenic Response to Loading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1596
The paper
Robling, A. G., Burr, D. B., & Turner, C. H. (2000). Partitioning a Daily Mechanical Stimulus into Discrete Loading Bouts Improves the Osteogenic Response to Loading. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1596

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.