Cited by 194Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Gender Specificity in the Genetic Determinants of Peak Bone Mass

Orwoll, Eric S., Belknap, John K., Klein, Robert F.·2001·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Peak bone mass is a major determinant of osteoporotic fracture risk. Gender differences in peak bone mass acquisition are well recognized in humans and may account for a substantial share of the increased prevalence of fragility fractures in women compared with men. Skeletal development is regulated by both heritable and environmental factors. Experimental animal models provide a means to circumvent complicating environmental factors. In this study we examined the heritability of peak bone mineral density (BMD) in genetically distinct laboratory mouse strains raised under strict environmental control and sought to identify genetic loci that may contribute to gender differences in this skeletal phenotype. Peak whole body BMD of male and female mice from a panel of 18 recombinant inbred (RI) strains derived from a cross between C57BL/6 and DBA/2 progenitors (BXD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A highly significant relationship existed between body weight and BMD in the BXD RI mice (r2 = 0.25; p = 1 × 10−43). To allow for comparison between male and female RI strains, whole body BMD values were corrected for the influence of body weight. The distribution of weight-corrected BMD (WC-BMD) values among the strains indicated the presence of strong genetic influences in both genders, with an estimated narrow sense heritability of 45% and 22% in male and female mice, respectively. Comparison of RI strain results by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant strain-by-gender interaction (F1,17,479 = 6.13; p < 0.0001). Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of the BXD RI strain series provisionally identified nine chromosomal sites linked to peak bone mass development in males and seven regions in females. In two cases, the provisional chromosomal loci were shared between genders, but in most cases they were distinct (five female-specific QTLs and six male-specific QTLs). QTL analysis of a genetically heterogeneous F2 population derived from the B6 and D2 progenitor strains provided additional support for the gender specificity of two loci. A significant phenotype-genotype correlation was only observed in male F2 mice at microsatellite marker D7Mit114 on chromosome 7, and a correlation at D2Mit94 on chromosome 2 was only observed in female F2 mice. The present data highlight the important role of gender in the genetic basis of peak bone mass in laboratory mice. Because the male phenotype is associated with considerable fracture risk reduction, an elucidation of the nature of that effect could provide the basis for novel diagnostic, preventative, or therapeutic approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.11.1962

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Testosterone levels are linked to a variety of conditions and diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, erectile dysfunction, depression, obesity, stroke and osteoporosis.

    “Several studies have previously reported that testosterone levels are linked to a variety of conditions and diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, erectile dysfunction, depression, obesity, stroke and osteoporosis. 1-7”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orwoll, E. S., Belknap, J. K., & Klein, R. F.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Orwoll, Eric S.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
1962-1971
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2060662815
Cited by
194
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA 10760)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 44659, R01AR044659)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
peak bone mass, bone mineral density, sex differences, heritability, genetic loci, quantitative trait loci, BXD recombinant inbred mice, F2 intercross, osteoporosis, fragility fractures, body weight adjustment, mouse model, skeletal development, C57BL/6 mice, DBA/2 mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Crosses, Genetic, Female, Genetic Markers, Humans, Lod Score, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Sex Characteristics, Bone Density, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review