The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000
Abstract
It is more and more acknowledged that land-use/cover dynamic change has become a key subject urgently to be dealt with in the study of global environmental change. Supported by the Landsat TM digital images, spatial patterns and temporal variation of land-use change during 1995 –2000 are studied in the paper. According to the land-use dynamic degree model, supported by the 1km GRID data of land-use change and the comprehensive characters of physical, economic and social features, a dynamic regionalization of land-use change is designed to disclose the spatial pattern of land-use change processes. Generally speaking, in the traditional agricultural zones, e.g., Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Yangtze River Delta and Sichuan Basin, the built-up and residential areas occupy a great proportion of arable land, and in the interlock area of farming and pasturing of northern China and the oases agricultural zones, the reclamation of arable land is conspicuously driven by changes of production conditions, economic benefits and climatic conditions. The implementation of “returning arable land into woodland or grassland” policies has won initial success in some areas, but it is too early to say that the trend of deforestation has been effectively reversed across China. In this paper, the division of dynamic regionalization of land-use change is designed, for the sake of revealing the temporal and spatial features of land-use change and laying the foundation for the study of regional scale land-use changes. Moreover, an integrated study, including studies of spatial pattern and temporal process of land-use change, is carried out in this paper, which is an interesting try on the comparative studies of spatial pattern on change process and the change process of spatial pattern of land-use change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects
Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104330 · Cited by 420
Song, W., & Pijanowski, B. C. (2014) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.009 · Cited by 375
Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China
Piao, S., Fang, J., Zhou, L., Zhu, B., Tan, K., & Tao, S. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002274 · Cited by 349
Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land in China
Zhuang, D., Jiang, D., Liu, L., & Huang, Y. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.041 · Cited by 208
Self-citationAssessment of the production potentials of Miscanthus on marginal land in China
Xue, S., Lewandowski, I., Wang, X., & Yi, Z. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.040 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Liu, M., Zhuang, D., Zhang, Z., & Deng, X.
- Venue
- Science in China Series D Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Science China Press., Co. Ltd.
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-384
- ISSN
- 1006-9313 (ISSN-L)
- 1862-2801
- OpenAlex
- W1885868234
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1360/03yd9033
- The paper
- Liu, J., Liu, M., Zhuang, D., Zhang, Z., & Deng, X. (2003). Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Science in China Series D Earth Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1360/03yd9033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.