Cited by 128Reproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child HealthInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

The Incidence of Induced Abortion in Uganda

Open access
Singh, Susheela, Prada, Elena, Mirembe, Florence, Kiggundu, Charles·2005·International Family Planning Perspectives

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although Uganda's law permits induced abortion only to save a woman's life, many women obtain abortions, often under unhygienic conditions. Small-scale studies suggest that unsafe abortion is an important health problem in Uganda, but no national quantitative studies of abortion exist. METHODS: A nationally representative survey of 313 health facilities that treat women who have postabortion complications and a survey of 53 professionals who are knowledgeable about the conditions of abortion provision in Uganda were conducted in 2003. Indirect estimation techniques were applied to the data to calculate the number of induced abortions performed annually. Abortion rates, abortion ratios and unintended pregnancy rates were calculated for the nation and its four major regions. Data on contraceptive use and unmet need were obtained from Demographic and Health Surveys. RESULTS: Each year, an estimated 297,000 induced abortions are performed in Uganda, and nearly 85,000 women are treated for complications. Abortions occur at a rate of 54 per 1,000 women aged 15-49 and account for one in five pregnancies. The abortion rate is higher than average in the Central region (62 per 1,000 women), the country's most urban and economically developed region. It is also very high in the Northern region (70 per 1,000). Nationally, about half of pregnancies are unintended; 51% of married women aged 15-49 and 12% of their unmarried counterparts have an unmet need for effective contraceptives. CONCLUSIONS: Unsafe abortion exacts a heavy toll on women in Uganda. To reduce unplanned pregnancy and unsafe abortion, and to improve women's health, increased access to contraceptive services is needed for all women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1363/3118305

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Uganda, the estimated rate of unsafe abortion is 54 per 1000 women.

    “In Uganda, where abortion is only legally available to save the life of a woman, the estimated rate of unsafe abortion is 54 (7).”

    From Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview (2011) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Abortion Incidence section (Table 5, p. 187) estimates 54 induced abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–49 in 2003. The paper says abortions often occur under unsafe conditions and legal abortions are very rare, but it does not identify 54 as a rate specifically for unsafe abortions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ibid.; and Mirembe F, A situational analysis of induced abortions in Uganda, African Journal of Fertility, Sexuality and Reproductive Health, 1996, 1(1):79-80.
  2. World Bank, World Development Report 2006: Equity and Devel- opment, 2005, Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford Universi- ty Press, 2005.
  3. Singh S and Wulf D, Estimated levels of induced abortion in six Latin American countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1994, 20(1):4-13;
  4. Singh S et al., Estimating the level of abortion in the Philippines and Bangladesh, International Family Planning Per- spectives, 1997, 23(3):100-107; and Henshaw SK et al., The inci- dence of induced abortion in Nigeria, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 24(4):156-164.
  5. Bongaarts J and Potter RG, Fertility, Biology and Behavior: An Analy- sis of the Proximate Determinants, New York: Academic Press, 1983;
  6. Harlap S, Shiono PH and Ramcharan S, A life table of spontaneous abortions and the effects of age, parity and other variables, in: Hook EB and Porter I, eds., Human Embryonic and Fetal Death, New York: Academic Press, 1980.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, S., Prada, E., Mirembe, F., & Kiggundu, C.
Affiliations
Guttmacher Institute (US)
Venue
International Family Planning Perspectives
Published
2005-12
Volume
31
Issue
04
Pages
183-191
ISSN
0190-3187 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056610655
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Family Planning Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
abortion, unsafe abortion, abortion rates, unintended pregnancy, unmet need for contraception, contraceptive use, abortion law, regional variation, Uganda
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Facilities, Health Surveys, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review