Postabortion Family Planning: Addressing the Cycle of RepeatUnintended Pregnancy and Abortion
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Postabortion contraceptive counseling is an important means to avoid repeating the cycle of unprotected intercourse, unwanted pregnancy and repeat unsafe abortion.
“Postabortion contraceptive counseling is considered an important means to avoid repeating the vicious cycle of unprotected intercourse, unwanted pregnancy and repeat unsafe abortion (47).”
From Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview (2011) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Senlet P et al., Bridging the gap: integrating family planning with abortion services in Turkey, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2001, 27(2):90-95.
- Johnson BR et al., Reducing unplanned pregnancy and abortion in Zimbabwe through postabortion contraception, Studies in Family Plan- ning, 2002, 33(2):195-202.
- Billings DL, Fuentes VJ and Perez-Cuevas R, Comparing the qual- ity of three models of postabortion care in public hospitals in Mexico City, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2003, 29(3):112-120.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview
RASCH, V. (2011) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01165.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Curtis, C., Huber, D., & Moss-Knight, T.
- Venue
- International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- Guttmacher Institute
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 044-048
- ISSN
- 1944-0391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4239156027
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Keywords
- repeat abortion, unintended pregnancy, abortion, family planning
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Contraception, Counseling, Family Planning Services, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Unwanted, United States, Women's Health Services, Women's Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review