The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives
Abstract
CONTEXT: Understanding women's reasons for having abortions can inform public debate and policy regarding abortion and unwanted pregnancy. Demographic changes over the last two decades highlight the need for a reassessment of why women decide to have abortions. METHODS: In 2004, a structured survey was completed by 1,209 abortion patients at 11 large providers, and in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 women at four sites. Bivariate analyses examined differences in the reasons for abortion across subgroups, and multivariate logistic regression models assessed associations between respondent characteristics and reported reasons. RESULTS: The reasons most frequently cited were that having a child would interfere with a woman's education, work or ability to care for dependents (74%); that she could not afford a baby now (73%); and that she did not want to be a single mother or was having relationship problems (48%). Nearly four in 10 women said they had completed their childbearing, and almost one-third were not ready to have a child. Fewer than 1% said their parents' or partners' desire for them to have an abortion was the most important reason. Younger women often reported that they were unprepared for the transition to motherhood, while older women regularly cited their responsibility to dependents. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to have an abortion is typically motivated by multiple, diverse and interrelated reasons. The themes of responsibility to others and resource limitations, such as financial constraints and lack of partner support, recurred throughout the study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Young people desire to avoid parenthood in order to focus on their own education, professional development, relationships, and other aspects of their lives (Finer et al., 2005).”
From The role (and limits) of developmental neuroscience in determining adolescents' autonomy rights: The case for reproductive and voting rights (2024) · cites this paper as Finer et al., 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abortion Stigma: A Systematic Review
Hanschmidt, F., Linde, K., Hilbert, A., Riedel-Heller, S. G., & Kersting, A. (2016) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/48e8516 · Cited by 428
Abortion Stigma: A Reconceptualization of Constituents, Causes, and Consequences
Norris, A. H., Bessett, D., Steinberg, J. R., Kavanaugh, M. L., Zordo, S. D., & Becker, D. (2011) · Women s Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010 · Cited by 397
Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review
Grace, K. T., & Anderson, J. (2016) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016663935 · Cited by 347
Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence.
Major, B., Appelbaum, M. I., Beckman, L. J., Dutton, M. A., Russo, N. F., & West, C. M. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0017497 · Cited by 340
Foster, D. G., Biggs, M. A., Ralph, L. J., Gerdts, C., Roberts, S. C. M., & Glymour, M. M. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.304247 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Finer, L. B., Frohwirth, L. F., Dauphinee, L. A., Singh, S., & Moore, A. M.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 110-118
- ISSN
- 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4230122068
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Keywords
- abortion, reasons for abortion, women's reproductive choices, American women
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Induced, Abortion, Legal, Adolescent, Adult, Contraception, Decision Making, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Motivation, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Women's Rights, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Women's Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review