The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abortion Incidence and Access to Services In the United States, 2008
Abstract
CONTEXT: The incidence of abortion has declined nearly every year between 1990 and 2005, but this trend may be ending, or at least leveling off. Access to abortion services is a critical issue, particularly since the number of abortion providers has been falling for the last three decades. METHODS: In 2009 and 2010, all facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2007 and 2008 were contacted, including hospitals, clinics and physicians’ offices. Data on the number of abortions performed were collected and combined with population data to estimate national and state‐level abortion rates. Abortion incidence, provision of early medication abortion, gestational limits, charges and antiabortion harassment were assessed by provider type and abortion caseload. RESULTS: In 2008, an estimated 1.21 million abortions were performed in the United States. The abortion rate increased 1% between 2005 and 2008, from 19.4 to 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44; the total number of abortion providers was virtually unchanged. Small changes in national abortion incidence and number of providers masked substantial changes in some states. Accessibility of services changed little: In both years, 35% of women of reproductive age lived in the 87% of counties that lacked a provider. Fifty‐seven percent of nonhospital providers experienced antiabortion harassment in 2008; levels of harassment were particularly high in the Midwest (85%) and the South (75%). CONCLUSIONS: The long‐term decline in abortion incidence has stalled. Higher levels of harassment in some regions suggest the need to enact and enforce laws that prohibit the more intrusive forms of harassment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shifts in Intended and Unintended Pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301416 · Cited by 770
Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends
Sedgh, G., Bearak, J., Singh, S., Bankole, A., Popinchalk, A., Ganatra, B., Rossier, C., Gerdts, C., Tunçalp, Ö., Johnson, B. R., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30380-4 · Cited by 766
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014
Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/psrh.12015 · Cited by 455
Self-citationThe Comparative Safety of Legal Induced Abortion and Childbirth in the United States
Raymond, E. G., & Grimes, D. A. (2012) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31823fe923 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. K., & Kooistra, K.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- Guttmacher Institute
- Published
- 2011-01-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-50
- ISSN
- 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-2393
- OpenAlex
- W1966003768
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abortion Incidence and Access to Services In the United States, 2008. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1363/4304111
- The paper
- Jones, R. K., & Kooistra, K. (2011). Abortion Incidence and Access to Services In the United States, 2008. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1363/4304111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.