The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control and measurement of ultrashort pulse shapes (in amplitude and phase) with femtosecond accuracy
Abstract
The performances of a tunable femtosecond dye laser are analyzed using accurate correlation techniques. The source is a passively mode-locked dye laser, of which both the frequency and frequency modulation are controlled by one or two intracavity prisms. Interferometric second-order autocorrelations, with a peak-to-background ratio of 8 to 1, are used simultaneously with the conventional intensity autocorrelation and the pulse spectrum to determine the pulse shape. The main advantages of the interferometric autocorrelations are that they provide phase information otherwise not available, and they are more sensitive to the pulse shape than the intensity autocorrelation. The phase sensitivity is demonstrated in an analysis of the Gaussian pulses with a linear frequency modulation. Analytical expressions for the envelopes of the interferometric autocorrelations of typical pulse shapes are provided for quick pulse shape identification. A numerical method is used to analyze the more complex pulse shapes and chirps that can be produced by the laser. A series of examples demonstrates the control of this laser over various pulse shapes and frequency modulations. Pulse broadening or compression by propagation through glass is calculated for the pulse shapes determined from the fittings. Comparisons of autocorrelations and cross correlations calculated for the dispersed pulses, with the actual measurements, demonstrate the accuracy of the fitting procedure. The method of pulse shape determination demonstrated here requires a train of identical pulses. Indeed, it is shown that, for example, a train of unchirped pulses randomly distributed in frequency can have the same interferometric autocorrelation than a single chirped pulse. In the case of the present source, a comparison of the pulse spectrum, with that of the second harmonic, gives an additional proof that pulse-to-pulse fluctuations are negligible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Characterization of arbitrary femtosecond pulses using frequency-resolved optical gating
Kane, D. J., & Trebino, R. (1993) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.199311 · Cited by 871
Metal Nanoparticle Gratings: Influence of Dipolar Particle Interaction on the Plasmon Resonance
Lamprecht, B., Schider, G., Lechner, R. T., Ditlbacher, H., Krenn, J. R., Leitner, A., & Aussenegg, F. R. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4721 · Cited by 586
Kane, D. J., & Trebino, R. (1993) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.18.000823 · Cited by 503
Femtosecond optical pulse shaping and processing
Weiner, A. M. (1995) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/0079-6727(94)00013-o · Cited by 458
Makris, K. G., Suntsov, S., Christodoulides, D. N., Stegeman, G. I., & Hache, A. (2005) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.30.002466 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Diels, J.-C. M., Fontaine, J. J., McMichael, I. C., & Simoni, F.
- Venue
- Applied Optics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1985-05-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1270
- ISSN
- 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4522
- OpenAlex
- W1974001025
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control and measurement of ultrashort pulse shapes (in amplitude and phase) with femtosecond accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.24.001270
- The paper
- Diels, J.-C. M., Fontaine, J. J., McMichael, I. C., & Simoni, F. (1985). Control and measurement of ultrashort pulse shapes (in amplitude and phase) with femtosecond accuracy. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.24.001270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.